PDA

View Full Version : Kordell Sewart over AVP?



BillC
02-12-2003, 07:30 PM
Who will pick up Kordell this offseason?






We are paying AVP $1 Million- if we can get Kordell im here for vet minimum- why not?


He's got more experience, success, and is a better athlete than doughboy.

And isn't there a salary cap discount for vets who sign for the minimum?:baghead:

Mr. Miyagi
02-12-2003, 08:33 PM
No Bill, Kordell wouldn't sign for the vet min anyway. And I wouldn't want him either, because he's a unhappy backup. He wants to be a starter.

And yes the cap discount for the vet min is I think $200K.

kgun12
02-12-2003, 08:42 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! FREAKIN WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Novacane
02-12-2003, 09:00 PM
What kgun12 said!

The_Philster
02-12-2003, 09:32 PM
What kgun12 and Fairway To Green said....NO!!!

Cntrygal
02-12-2003, 09:52 PM
I agree with the "negatives" in this case.

(btw... phil - do you realize how hard it is to see your name?)

MissBuffalo
02-13-2003, 11:29 AM
Eugh!!! Kordell is crap. AVP is a way better backup than him. Besides, like Mr. Miyagi said, he wants to be a starter. We don't need any cry babies on the team.

Sabre Ally
02-13-2003, 12:03 PM
One write-in vote for Ricky Williams :chuckle:

TigerJ
02-13-2003, 12:58 PM
What everyone else said. Kordell can't read defences. A coordinator would have to design a dumbed down scheme just for him. Coordinator's have better ways to spend their time than designing offences for backups.

THATHURMANATOR
02-13-2003, 03:17 PM
I would take him over vanpelt.

northernbillfan
02-14-2003, 04:18 AM
Kordell can NOT win the big game. He has always choked.

You can rely on AVP.

Lets stop this silly talk, right now.

Buffarama
02-14-2003, 07:44 AM
I think Stewart is much better than AVP, and would be a great backup for change of pace if nothing else. Only for the vet minimum though.

Typ0
02-14-2003, 07:47 PM
Stewart might make a good receiver.

Dozerdog
02-14-2003, 07:50 PM
Whatever team he ends up on, i'm sure the center is really nervous