PDA

View Full Version : Why Watson and not Ahmad Brooks???



X-Era
06-08-2006, 06:22 PM
Brooks will be in the suplemental draft and is a flat out player.

Like Watson he has a questionable past. But unlike Watson, he has all the tools to be a star.

Im just saying if were willing to role the dice, why not take Brooks over Watson?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/9447397

http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/profile_display.cfm?Prospect_ID=498

Tatonka
06-08-2006, 07:26 PM
because watson cost us tim euhus.. brooks will cost us a 3rd rounder in next years draft.

eeyyeeddoogg
06-08-2006, 08:02 PM
The 3rd rders.this decade:
Youboty, Everett, Anderson, Crowell, Wire, Edwards, Jennings, Moore

Nothing earth shattering. I would give up the 3rd rd. pick for Brooks.