#4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_Philster
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 52180

    #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

    Following the departure of Bills veteran receiver Eric Moulds there was no question that Lee Evans was the indisputable number one receiver on Buffalo's roster. A former number one pick and groomed to be a franchise receiver, Evans is ready to assume that role. But who is ready to fall in line right behind him?
    "It's certainly going to be a group effort for us to step up and make this offense work," said Evans. "The guys who have not had those looks know they have to step up and if they do we'll be successful on offense throwing the ball."
    more


    Interesting that they posted Peerless' pic with this article
    The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!
  • ICE74129
    Legendary Zoner
    • Feb 2005
    • 10796

    #2
    Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

    Peerless will be the #2

    Comment

    • BuffaloBillsStampede
      Registered User
      • Aug 2005
      • 1230

      #3
      Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

      I almost want to say Josh Reed just because he and Losman seem to have something, but then I remember it's Josh Reed and I have no idea who it will be.
      SUPER MARIO PLEASE COME TO BUFFALO!!!!

      Comment

      • jamze132
        Don’t hate…
        • Jun 2003
        • 29379

        #4
        Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

        It will come down to Price and Davis more than likely. I don't really see anyone else stepping up. But I would love for Nance to be involved in the mix all season.

        Comment

        • HHURRICANE
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 15490

          #5
          Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

          Originally posted by BuffaloBillsStampede
          I almost want to say Josh Reed just because he and Losman seem to have something, but then I remember it's Josh Reed and I have no idea who it will be.
          I am ambivalent but I think it will be Reed. Not because of Losman but because he should be better than Davis or Price. Davis or Price making #2 is a stretch.

          Comment

          • finsrclowns
            Registered User
            • Apr 2004
            • 1408

            #6
            Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

            I vote for Reed as long as the other teams promise to count to "5 Mississippi" before rushing so he can get open. Otherwise I'd go with Price. I wouldn't rule out Parrish as the #3 guy either- we need speed on the field.
            finsrclowns

            Comment

            • Earthquake Enyart
              Legendary Zoner
              • Jul 2002
              • 27521

              #7
              Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

              You could cover Reed with a LB.

              It has to be Davis or Price.

              Comment

              • justasportsfan
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 71596

                #8
                Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                I don't think we'll have a 1000 yd wr receiver this year. But we'll have several 500-1000 wr's. TE will also be more involved.
                sacrifice1
                https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                Comment

                • Dr. Lecter
                  Zero for Zero!
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 67939

                  #9
                  Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                  Originally posted by jamze132
                  It will come down to Price and Davis more than likely. I don't really see anyone else stepping up. But I would love for Nance to be involved in the mix all season.
                  If he makes the team he will likely be a gameday inactive.
                  Originally posted by mysticsoto
                  Lecter is right in everything he said.

                  Comment

                  • finsrclowns
                    Registered User
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 1408

                    #10
                    Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                    Originally posted by justasportsfan
                    I don't think we'll have a 1000 yd wr receiver this year. But we'll have several 500-1000 wr's. TE will also be more involved.
                    If we don't, the JP experiment will be over and Lee Evans isn't the player I think he is. In the Fairchild offense if Evans doesn't average better than 60 yards a week, we won't win 4 games. Mark me down as predicting a 1000+ yard season for Evans. If we could get 400 yards receiving from TE's I'd take that right now.
                    finsrclowns

                    Comment

                    • HHURRICANE
                      Registered User
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 15490

                      #11
                      Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                      Originally posted by finsrclowns
                      If we don't, the JP experiment will be over and Lee Evans isn't the player I think he is. In the Fairchild offense if Evans doesn't average better than 60 yards a week, we won't win 4 games. Mark me down as predicting a 1000+ yard season for Evans. If we could get 400 yards receiving from TE's I'd take that right now.

                      Evans can only make 1000 yards with JP as the QB. With that said, I believe you are right on all accounts.

                      Comment

                      • justasportsfan
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 71596

                        #12
                        Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                        Originally posted by finsrclowns
                        If we don't, the JP experiment will be over and Lee Evans isn't the player I think he is. In the Fairchild offense if Evans doesn't average better than 60 yards a week, we won't win 4 games. Mark me down as predicting a 1000+ yard season for Evans. If we could get 400 yards receiving from TE's I'd take that right now.
                        I say that because we're rebuilding and Fairchild will be experimenting with our wr's who are all speedsters. Okay maybe Evans but not probowl nos. Maybe 1100 yds?

                        Parrish and Reed are interchangeable. Davis and Price and if TE's get involved, it could affect wr's nos. plus I believe Fairchild will use our rb's more than Moolarkey did.
                        sacrifice1
                        https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                        Comment

                        • finsrclowns
                          Registered User
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 1408

                          #13
                          Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                          Originally posted by justasportsfan
                          I say that because we're rebuilding and Fairchild will be experimenting with our wr's who are all speedsters. Okay maybe Evans but not probowl nos. Maybe 1100 yds?

                          Parrish and Reed are interchangeable. Davis and Price and if TE's get involved, it could affect wr's nos. plus I believe Fairchild will use our rb's more than Moolarkey did.
                          1100 sounds about right for Evans. We NEED that out of him to have a chance.

                          Personally I hope Parrish steps up as the #3. We pretty much know what we've got with Reed and he's no speedster, personally I prefer Price at #2 if he's got anything left. Parrish is a midget but he's a fast midget. With the crackdown on contact after 5 yards midgets are back in fashion in the NFL.

                          Replacing Mike Williams with Peters and Anderson with Reyes makes our line more mobile. You need moving parts to have a dominant run game. Mularkey's off tackle left/ off tackle right isn't the way to go for Willis or our offense. Speed to the edges slows down teams ability to apply pressure. That will help JP a lot.
                          finsrclowns

                          Comment

                          • Don't Panic
                            All-Pro Zoner
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 4227

                            #14
                            Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                            Originally posted by justasportsfan
                            I don't think we'll have a 1000 yd wr receiver this year. But we'll have several 500-1000 wr's. TE will also be more involved.
                            I'd be happy with 900 yards out of Evans, 800 out of Price, 600 out of Reed and Royal/Everett (whoever starts), 400 out of Parrish and McGahee. That would be fine with me... 3700 or so for Losman. Who could complain? (dare I ask?)

                            Comment

                            • Night Train
                              Retired - On Several Levels
                              • Jul 2005
                              • 33117

                              #15
                              Re: #4: Who Will Be the Number Two Wide Receiver?

                              I wouldn't be happy with 900 yards for Evans. That means he's way underutilized, much like the last 2 years. The guy is a major talent.

                              Get him the ball at least 90 times.
                              Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X