i dont know guys, but i think they looked good this past season and i wouldn't mind signing them to long term deals.
Hollis was very accurate and gave us stability at the position.(we certainly didn't have that during the 2001-2002 season)
He's a an UFA and im sure he wants to stay here cuz he's gonna get a lot of scoring opportunities.
Moorman was impressive all season and was more consistent than the season before. He's a RFA and we could also sign him long-term.
i like the idea cuz hollis is very reliable (the 54 yarder against minny really made me beleive in his kick's accuracy and power)
Moorman was very reliably and his 82 yarder against GB that was downed in the 5 was the longest of the season for any punter.
thoughts?
Hollis was very accurate and gave us stability at the position.(we certainly didn't have that during the 2001-2002 season)
He's a an UFA and im sure he wants to stay here cuz he's gonna get a lot of scoring opportunities.
Moorman was impressive all season and was more consistent than the season before. He's a RFA and we could also sign him long-term.
i like the idea cuz hollis is very reliable (the 54 yarder against minny really made me beleive in his kick's accuracy and power)
Moorman was very reliably and his 82 yarder against GB that was downed in the 5 was the longest of the season for any punter.
thoughts?
Comment