PDA

View Full Version : the end for Bledso?


THE END OF ALL DAYS
08-10-2006, 10:18 PM
is bledslow getting phased out soon?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/football/nfl/08/10/bc.fbn.cowboys.quarterbacks.ap/index.html
Dozerdog
08-10-2006, 10:21 PM
OXNARD, Calif. (AP) -- Bill Parcells says "there would be a pretty good chance" that Tony Romo (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6624) will start at quarterback for the Dallas Cowboys (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/teams/cowboys) in their preseason opener against Seattle on Saturday night.
The move has nothing to do with starter Drew Bledsoe (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/2359) and everything to do with evaluating Romo, who is going into his fourth season without having thrown a pass in a regular-season game.


Hey! There is an actual article!

Once you read into it a few sentances, the answer to this thread is "No"
THE END OF ALL DAYS
08-10-2006, 10:23 PM
damn... I was trying to draw attention from our own QB disaster! :)
Dozerdog
08-10-2006, 10:26 PM
What I think it does point out is that coaches approach who starts these poreseason games a lot differently than the fans do.

Coaches have reasons for what they do.

Fans are knee-jerk reactonairies who make decisions on who's a starter based on surfing reports on the internet and talk radio


JUST LET IT ALL PLAY OUT
YardRat
08-10-2006, 10:33 PM
If Parcell's wasn't such a crappy head coach, he would've cut Drew before the draft and just handed the job to Romo. Let the kid start 16 games, and then evaluate whether or not he's the future of the franchise and move on from there.
Night Train
08-11-2006, 05:34 AM
Fans are knee-jerk reactonairies

NO ! Not here ! Just try and show me some dumb posts !


Wait...I just received 3,756 new messages...:rolleyes:
The King
08-11-2006, 06:44 AM
If Parcell's wasn't such a crappy head coach, he would've cut Drew before the draft and just handed the job to Romo. Let the kid start 16 games, and then evaluate whether or not he's the future of the franchise and move on from there.

Thats the dumbest thing ever, no one in their right mind just hands over a job.
mybills
08-11-2006, 06:49 AM
I bet this thread title made you nervous, MBB! :snicker:
don137
08-11-2006, 07:03 AM
Eesh, I think people are really looking to make something out of nothing. Bledsoe is 34 so all they want to see is if his replacement is on the roster and with Romo's contract up after the season would it be worth re-signing. It has nothing to do with Bedsoe being phased out quickly.
Statman
08-11-2006, 09:47 AM
What I think it does point out is that coaches approach who starts these poreseason games a lot differently than the fans do.

Coaches have reasons for what they do.

Fans are knee-jerk reactonairies who make decisions on who's a starter based on surfing reports on the internet and talk radio


JUST LET IT ALL PLAY OUT
The difference between Dallas and us is that no one knows what Romo can do, much like Losman. Everyone knows what Holcomb can do. They also know he's not going to get any better. He's a senior citizen by NFL standards.
Iehoshua
08-11-2006, 11:23 AM
Bledsoe still blows!

:bravo:
ICE74129
08-11-2006, 11:27 AM
If Parcell's wasn't such a crappy head coach, he would've cut Drew before the draft and just handed the job to Romo. Let the kid start 16 games, and then evaluate whether or not he's the future of the franchise and move on from there.

Why? Romo isn't as talented as JP. They didn't spend all those draft picks on him and he hasn't shown the upside JP has.