0 sacks and they were backups. Should this be a concern??
Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Collapse
X
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by Kerr0 sacks and they were backups. Should this be a concern??
Its just JP's fault
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by ICE74129No. The only reason we lost is JP And his fumbles. Not the fact we got no pressure with our DL on backups, Willis fumble led to at least a 10 point swing, DB's couldn't stop Johnson etc.
Its just JP's fault
All you had to say is no.
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Even though the DEs didn't have any sacks, Wright was under alot of pressure during the first half. Schoebel got into Wright's face on Tripplett's sack and really caused it. Denney had pressure a couple of times and batted down a pass in the end zone. I had to look up on the Bills' website who #91 was. Eric Powell was all over the place and around the QB a few times. I didn't see much of Kelsay though.
You know that Schoebel is solid, but I think the Bills are going to be OK this year with Kelsay, Denney, and Powell as the other three DEs.
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by Kerr0 sacks and they were backups. Should this be a concern??
People forget that in the early 90s, Levy lost most of the preseason games too...it doesn't mean anything!!!
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by mysticsotoRemember...Vanilla defense. Nothing is disguised. No surprises or tipping of our hand to show packages we will implement.
People forget that in the early 90s, Levy lost most of the preseason games too...it doesn't mean anything!!!
Understood, but if it takes a scheme to get our ends to get a sack, then that's kind of pathetic. I mean our starting ends should at least gain a sack on their pure speed, quickness and strength, especially against backups.
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by KerrUnderstood, but if it takes a scheme to get our ends to get a sack, then that's kind of pathetic. I mean our starting ends should at least gain a sack on their pure speed, quickness and strength, especially against backups.
I expect Levy to address the position next year in the draft possibly in the 1st rd...barring how our QB situation turns out.
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by mysticsotoWe haven't had speed, quickness and strength at the DE position since Bruce. Schobel gets his sacks purely on tenacity. Kelsay and Denney get sacks very sporadically and haven't been shown to have what it takes to go to the next level. All in all, DE is really one of our weaker positions.
I expect Levy to address the position next year in the draft possibly in the 1st rd...barring how our QB situation turns out.
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
You also need to keep in mind that the Bengals have one of the best O-lines (and in particular, their tackles) in the league."'Clean up your room.', 'Stand up straight.', 'Pick up your feet.', 'Take it like a man.', 'Be nice to your sister.', 'Don't mix beer and wine, ever.'. Oh yeah, 'Don't drive on the railroad track.'"
"Eh, Phil. That's one I happen to agree with."
Comment
-
-
Re: Our starting ends against bengals OT's
Originally posted by MikeInRochYou also need to keep in mind that the Bengals have one of the best O-lines (and in particular, their tackles) in the league.
Backup tackles as well? Their starting tackles didn't play in the game at all.
Comment
-
Comment