Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490

    Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

    In order:

    1) Evans
    2) Price
    3) Reed
    4) Parrish
    5) Aiken
    6) Wilson

    Davis and Smith are getting cut. Any thoughts as I am stretching by having Wilson making the team.
  • ICE74129
    Legendary Zoner
    • Feb 2005
    • 10796

    #2
    Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

    Originally posted by HHURRICANE
    In order:

    1) Evans
    2) Price
    3) Reed
    4) Parrish
    5) Aiken
    6) Wilson

    Davis and Smith are getting cut. Any thoughts as I am stretching by having Wilson making the team.
    I don't think so. Listening to DJ you would think he makes the team. I really expected Davis to do better

    Comment

    • Kerr
      Hall of Fame Zoner
      • Feb 2005
      • 6656

      #3
      Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

      I think that sounds just about right.

      Comment

      • Jan Reimers
        Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
        • May 2003
        • 17353

        #4
        Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

        Originally posted by HHURRICANE
        In order:

        1) Evans
        2) Price
        3) Reed
        4) Parrish
        5) Aiken
        6) Wilson

        Davis and Smith are getting cut. Any thoughts as I am stretching by having Wilson making the team.
        That would be my guess, too. We have enough kickoff and punt returners to withstand the loss of Fast Freddie - who really isn't all that fast.
        Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

        Comment

        • bigbub2352
          Registered User
          • Feb 2005
          • 5386

          #5
          Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

          I think that is good i also thought more out of Davis, but u might see him there instead of Wilson, i like Wilson but that would be the only thing i could see different, I cannot believe we have ****ing josh reed again he sucks so bad
          XTRA CRISPY XTRA SAUCEY

          Comment

          • Night Train
            Retired - On Several Levels
            • Jul 2005
            • 33117

            #6
            Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

            Ralph likes family. Wilson sticks.
            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

            Comment

            • TigerJ
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 22575

              #7
              Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

              That's how I see it. I too was hoping for more out of Davis because he does have terrific speed. His play was just ordinary however. How do you cut someone (Wilson) who never drops a ball?
              I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

              I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

              Comment

              • HHURRICANE
                Registered User
                • Mar 2005
                • 15490

                #8
                Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

                Originally posted by TigerJ
                That's how I see it. I too was hoping for more out of Davis because he does have terrific speed. His play was just ordinary however. How do you cut someone (Wilson) who never drops a ball?
                Yeah, I agree. If you earn the job how do you not get it. Davis has been hype his whole career and he showed up in Buffalo the same way. If you can't beat out Josh Reed for #3 why do you keep him at #6?!

                Comment

                • ICE74129
                  Legendary Zoner
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 10796

                  #9
                  Re: Whose the starting 5 receivers + 1 extra?!

                  Can't disagree with H on that

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X