PDA

View Full Version : New power rankings


Marino13Phins
09-01-2006, 01:46 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2006&week=1
justasportsfan
09-01-2006, 01:53 PM
kewl
LtFinFan66
09-01-2006, 01:56 PM
can't really argue with their comment:

<TABLE class=tablehead cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=3 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=evenrow align=left><TD>30 (28)</TD><TD>Bills (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=buf)</TD><TD width=50>5-11-0</TD><TD>If the Bills are going to be competitive, they need Willis McGahee to be as good as he thinks he is.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
OpIv37
09-01-2006, 01:57 PM
Green Bay and Cleveland should be slightly higher, Detroit and Tennesee slightly lower, but it's not too bad. I think a few of the teams ranked 25-30 are actually worse than us.
SABURZFAN
09-01-2006, 01:57 PM
the Raiders are too high at #25.
OpIv37
09-01-2006, 01:57 PM
the Raiders are too high at #25.

signing Jeff George should get them an automatic 30 or lower.
ICE74129
09-01-2006, 01:58 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2006&week=1
Ok whos the chick and what site is she on. Power rankings be damned!
Mr. Cynical
09-01-2006, 02:04 PM
5-11 is about right imo....4-12 very possible tho as well
Meathead
09-01-2006, 02:05 PM
personally i think its crazy to have the bills at 30. right around 20 appears more like it. we shall find out
SABURZFAN
09-01-2006, 02:09 PM
signing Jeff George should get them an automatic 30 or lower.


they'll be lucky to win 4 games.
Marino13Phins
09-01-2006, 02:12 PM
Ok whos the chick and what site is she on. Power rankings be damned!

nextdoornikki.com
:up:
THATHURMANATOR
09-01-2006, 02:21 PM
Green Bay and Cleveland should be slightly higher, Detroit and Tennesee slightly lower, but it's not too bad. I think a few of the teams ranked 25-30 are actually worse than us.
You really think so with Green Bay? I think they will be Horrendous this season
Carlton Bailey
09-01-2006, 02:23 PM
And ESPN acts a fool again. 30 is such a bad ranking.
OpIv37
09-01-2006, 02:26 PM
You really think so with Green Bay? I think they will be Horrendous this season

oh I think they will be plenty bad- I just don't think they're quite as bad as Cleveland, Tennesee, Detroit, etc.
OpIv37
09-01-2006, 02:27 PM
personally i think its crazy to have the bills at 30. right around 20 appears more like it. we shall find out

I think 30 is a little low but there definitely aren't 12 teams in the NFL that appear worse than us right now.
HAMMER
09-01-2006, 02:30 PM
personally i think its crazy to have the bills at 30. right around 20 appears more like it. we shall find out

I agree Meat, 20 or so is spot on.
THATHURMANATOR
09-01-2006, 02:48 PM
oh I think they will be plenty bad- I just don't think they're quite as bad as Cleveland, Tennesee, Detroit, etc.
I do.
RedEyE
09-01-2006, 03:00 PM
I like when the Bills play as under dogs.
BillsOwnAll
09-01-2006, 03:17 PM
Who cares what power rankings say. If anythin itll just motivate the bills to prove that they are better then what people think.
Gunzlingr
09-01-2006, 03:34 PM
Greenbay is going to be godawful.

I miss WCF's power rankings, they were always unbiased and 100% accurate with the Fins always #1.
Bufftp
09-01-2006, 06:20 PM
personally i think its crazy to have the bills at 30. right around 20 appears more like it. we shall find out
I agree with you, especially if Lossmans growth is legit.
!Papacrunk!
09-01-2006, 06:26 PM
I've said this many times, these things are just for entertainment purposes only, nothing real scientific about them, so wouldn't let it bother you guys. It is ESPN. I'd rather them rate the Phins lower, since it's better to be the hungry under dog. I'm no english major, but this sentence made me scratch my head:
Reggie Bush is going to be some kind of fun to watch.
justasportsfan
09-01-2006, 06:28 PM
so wouldn't let it bother you guys. It is ESPN.actually , they ranked us too high.
TigerJ
09-01-2006, 06:30 PM
Not that I think Buffalo should be anywhere near the top of their rankings, but Buffalo beat Detroit in Detroit, and the game was not as close as the score. They bumped Detroit up from 24 to 23 and dropped Buffalo from 28 down to 30. What gives?
BADTHINGSMAN
09-01-2006, 09:58 PM
Green Bay and Cleveland should be slightly higher, Detroit and Tennesee slightly lower, but it's not too bad. I think a few of the teams ranked 25-30 are actually worse than us.


:up:
BADTHINGSMAN
09-01-2006, 10:00 PM
the Raiders are too high at #25.


:up: Raiders may have Moss, but who will throw to him,Brooks?? :rofl:
Novacane
09-02-2006, 01:31 PM
Greenbay is going to be godawful.

I miss WCF's power rankings, they were always unbiased and 100% accurate with the Fins always #1.

I miss them too. Wonder whatever happened to that genius