wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thecoordinator
    Registered User
    • Sep 2005
    • 134

    wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

    i like to guess the opening lines then check to see what they actually are. i had fins -3 as is the norm for a home team in a relatively even game. vegas disagrees though as fins open at -7. get it now bills fans i expect that number to drop like a brick. im even gonna have to get in on bills +7 and buy a half point to get bills +7.5. dont get greedy and take bills to win. take the points and the free money.

    ~your favorite fin fan~
  • ublinkwescore
    Sab and TD are insignificant
    • Sep 2002
    • 24178

    #2
    Re: wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

    why the hell do they have to make that $#!t all complicated?

    why do they use a -7 to show the favorite? That is, Miam over Buffalo by 7 points or more...

    Why can't they use a + sign?

    that pisses me off.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

    Comment

    • Mitchy moo
      Roways rooking ahread!
      • Sep 2005
      • 18380

      #3
      Re: wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

      I am going to load up in a big way on Buffalo, they are really lost on that spread. 3 points seems fair, 7 + is a joke.

      Comment

      • CuseJetsFan83
        Closet Bills Fan
        • Nov 2004
        • 4132

        #4
        Re: wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

        they use negatives because u'd pretend that the score is -7 to 0 at the beginning on of the game.......

        think of it as scooby's rep....... the preliminary is in the red..... now lets see if it becomes green or stays

        j-e-t-s
        jets jets jets (insert suck for those who aren't gangreen fans)



        Comment

        • ddaryl
          Everything I post is sexual inuendo
          • Jan 2005
          • 10714

          #5
          Re: wk 2 fins open -7 vs bills

          After what I saw today I'd bet the farm on Buffalo as I think Miami is completley over-rated and we're completely under-rated.

          Comment

          Working...
          X