While we're picking players apart...

[Pride]

Everytime I saw him he was 2 steps behind his man.. missing arm tackles, and generally not doing well.

anyone else notice the same?

[L.A. Playa]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

NE only completed 4 passes to WR's so I really think this would be nit picking at this point

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

Hmmm...New England's WRs only had 4 receptions for the entire game. So I can't really say I think Nate had a bad game, to be honest.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

Damn, you beat me to it Playa.

[eyedog]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

If Nate doesn't throw a shutout at his receiver it's considered a bad game by some. I mean really four total receptions. I recall one of those on him, maybe it was two but I can't remember a second, and a missed tackle on a running play.
Overall he wasn't the reason they lost.

[OpIv37]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

so, apparently you guys didn't see Clements miss several tackles?

This guy is NOT worth 7 million a season and I hope Youboty steps it up this season so we can let him go in the off-season. Or franchise him and get someone worth their salary.

We'll see how good Clements is in the rematch against Chambers this week.

[OpIv37]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

Overall he wasn't the reason they lost.

I half agree. He wasn't the sole reason why we lost, but if he had tackled better who knows how the game would have ended up.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

so, apparently you guys didn't see Clements miss several tackles?

This guy is NOT worth 7 million a season and I hope Youboty steps it up this season so we can let him go in the off-season. Or franchise him and get someone worth their salary.

We'll see how good Clements is in the rematch against Chambers this week.

I saw McGee miss just as many as Nate. I'm not overly worried about missed tackles, to be honest. Those can be fixed. He did his job, for the most part, in coverage.

You are right, we'll see how well he does vs Chambers, hopefully he can keep him in check.

[L.A. Playa]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

thanks alot Pride you just gave OP another thread to ***** in

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

I half agree. He wasn't the sole reason why we lost, but if he had tackled better who knows how the game would have ended up.

Him and Mcgee, and Crowell, and the rest of the D. Nate wasn't the only one missing tackles out there.

[eyedog]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

You also notice that Brady didn't look Nates way often.
And that is the point, it will be Nate on Chambers. Big difference fron the #2 receiver.
I would like to see him locked up long term but if he insists on breaking the bank, it appears, it will not happen in buffalo.

[mchurchfie]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

The biggest thing I noticed about him was that block in the back that cost us the go ahead, momentum turning TD return on that interception. I hope he has a better game against Chambers this year than he had last.

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

The biggest thing I noticed about him was that block in the back that cost us the go ahead, momentum turning TD return on that interception. I hope he has a better game against Chambers this year than he had last.

It won't be hard to be better than allowing 200 yards and 3 tds.

[OpIv37]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

thanks alot Pride you just gave OP another thread to ***** in

why is everyone on MY case? go look at the thread list right now- several people other than me have started threads critical of players.

I'm not the only one who saw some concerning things yesterday.

[OpIv37]

Re: While we're picking players apart...

Him and Mcgee, and Crowell, and the rest of the D. Nate wasn't the only one missing tackles out there.

that doesn't mean he should be let off the hook for the ones he missed.