Can you believe this idiot?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Can you believe this idiot?
I think you're missing the point of this whole article.
It's basically asking that now that we know more about each pick and other circumstances surrounding each individual teams players,depth,injuries etc., what would have been the right pick for each team ?
His comments regarding Whitner aren't bad at all but actually quite encouraging. He's alluding to the thought that some draftnicks who stress supposed value might still believe Whitner was picked in a higher slot than rated. But he's all football player and it's looking like a very wise choice right now.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 3
Comment
-
-
Re: Can you believe this idiot?
Nighttrain is right. It may be that Pasquarelli is slow to let go of the "reach" vocabulary for some reason, but the point of the article is which teams would have the same pick given current circustances and which teams would pick differently. Buffalo is one of the teams that would make the same pick. Reach or no reach, I think that means Pasquarelli thinks they made the right choice the first time around.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
-
👍 3
Comment
-
-
Re: Can you believe this idiot?
To me, he's an idiot because Whitner is outperforming Micheal Huff who was taken before him.
his 'reach' comments are a moot point that are slanderous as far as I'm concerned.www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire
Comment
-
Comment