How can we STILL think we need more OL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Check the stats guys.

    The two best LT's are probably Orlando Pace and Walter Jones. Yet, BOTH Bulger and Hasselbeck have been sacked more times than JP!!

    Hell, STL has Pace on one end and Alex Barron on the other.

    I think every team in the league probably feels like they could do better on the OL and maybe this stat shows that.

    Add in that we have the #1 rusher in the league for 2 straight weeks. How can we be clamoring for an upgrade at OL?

    Based on what? Penalties? yes, but what team hasnt had them that has a great o-line?

  • Forward_Lateral
    Registered User
    • Mar 2004
    • 29895

    #2
    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

    Because the Bills only have ONE backup guard on their Depth Chart.

    Comment

    • Night Train
      Retired - On Several Levels
      • Jul 2005
      • 33117

      #3
      Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

      How about OL that pancake the opposition in the running game ? That's the true measure.

      Sacks aren't the proper measure. You could stick 5 HOF OL in front of Bledsoe and he'd still get sacked 50 times.

      We still need a couple bigger, stronger OL to replace Chris V. and Gandy.
      Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

      Comment

      • X-Era
        What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
        • Feb 2005
        • 27670

        #4
        Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

        Originally posted by Forward_Lateral
        Because the Bills only have ONE backup guard on their Depth Chart.
        THAT I will buy!

        But that doesnt have to come from the 1st round

        Comment

        • X-Era
          What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
          • Feb 2005
          • 27670

          #5
          Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

          Originally posted by Night Train
          How about OL that pancake the opposition in the running game ? That's the true measure.

          Sacks aren't the proper measure. You could stick 5 HOF OL in front of Bledsoe and he'd still get sacked 50 times.

          We still need a couple bigger, stronger OL to replace Chris V. and Gandy.
          But if we arent looking at sacks and we have the #1 rusher in the league, whats the problem again?

          Im not saying its a perfect line. Im only asking if anyoen can point to another teams line that is perfect. Denver has the lightest OL in the league. The average weight is well under 300 pounds.

          Villarial is getting long in the tooth, so we may need a replacement. But I think we are about to see that we already have one in Duke Preston.

          Comment

          • Ron Burgundy
            Registered User
            • Nov 2005
            • 3154

            #6
            Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

            Originally posted by jp-era
            But if we arent looking at sacks and we have the #1 rusher in the league, whats the problem again?
            Yards per carry. Third down conversions. Penalties. Quarterback pressures.

            Your argument is flawed 'cause you're leaving out data. Our o-line definitely needs some tweaking.

            Comment

            • ICE74129
              Legendary Zoner
              • Feb 2005
              • 10796

              #7
              Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

              This OL still doesn't have a QUALITY LT or RG. Then there is depth which is lacking as well.

              I don't care how well we do or don't do this year, if Marv doesn't go out and land a top notch LT and RG, we aren't getting much better than we are now.

              Comment

              • BillsFever21
                Registered User
                • Aug 2004
                • 9067

                #8
                Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                If Losman wasn't so mobile this OL would've given up at least 16 sacks by now.

                And while McGahee is leading the league in rushing his YPC is very low. He's probably up there towards the front in attempts also. Plus there are many good RB's that have already had their bye week and McGahee has a game on them.

                Also, McGahee only has 1 TD. The OL has gotten manhandled inside the 10 yard line and couldn't get him any room to score. It took a penalty on the Vikings to even get the TD on Sunday.

                We also haven't been able to convert on short yardage in obvious running situation because our OL is getting knocked on their ass by the DL. This OL is improved over last year but far from not needing anymore help.

                Comment

                • BillsFever21
                  Registered User
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 9067

                  #9
                  Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                  Just as I thought. McGahee leads the league in attempts and he's 26th in YPC. His YPC is only 3.9. This OL still needs a lot of work.

                  Comment

                  • THATHURMANATOR
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 69112

                    #10
                    Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                    Originally posted by jp-era
                    Check the stats guys.

                    The two best LT's are probably Orlando Pace and Walter Jones. Yet, BOTH Bulger and Hasselbeck have been sacked more times than JP!!

                    Hell, STL has Pace on one end and Alex Barron on the other.

                    I think every team in the league probably feels like they could do better on the OL and maybe this stat shows that.

                    Add in that we have the #1 rusher in the league for 2 straight weeks. How can we be clamoring for an upgrade at OL?

                    Based on what? Penalties? yes, but what team hasnt had them that has a great o-line?
                    How can you think we don't need more help on the Oline?

                    Comment

                    • Saratoga Slim
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 4154

                      #11
                      Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                      Originally posted by BillsFever21

                      Also, McGahee only has 1 TD. The OL has gotten manhandled inside the 10 yard line and couldn't get him any room to score. It took a penalty on the Vikings to even get the TD on Sunday.

                      We also haven't been able to convert on short yardage in obvious running situation because our OL is getting knocked on their ass by the DL. This OL is improved over last year but far from not needing anymore help.
                      Agreed. You can tell a good run blocking offensive line when you see a push on short yardage situations. While the line this year is definately playing better than last, we still struggle to run on third and short and near the goal line. Even McGahee's touchdown last week was more his effort than the line's success in clearing a path. I'm happy with the improvement, and don't fault Levy and Co. for making the offseason decisions that they did in light of the numerous holes we had to fill, but I'm really hoping this next free agent period and draft land us a solid RG, perhaps an upgrade at LT, and some depth.
                      Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

                      Comment

                      • Earthquake Enyart
                        Legendary Zoner
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 27521

                        #12
                        Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                        Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
                        How can you think we don't need more help on the Oline?
                        Exactly.

                        After the Bear game, everyone will think we need 4 new starters.

                        Comment

                        • Historian
                          2020-2023 AFC East Champions!
                          • Dec 2002
                          • 61707

                          #13
                          Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                          I don't think you can ever have enough quality O linemen, or defensive backs.

                          Comment

                          • EDS
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 5216

                            #14
                            Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                            Originally posted by BillsFever21
                            Just as I thought. McGahee leads the league in attempts and he's 26th in YPC. His YPC is only 3.9. This OL still needs a lot of work.
                            Agreed.

                            I really think right guard is a huge problem right now because the team has had very little success running up the middle. A stud right guard would go a long way to opening up some daylight for Willis. Fortunately, I think this something that is correctable in free agency or the draft (although they may have to draft a left tackle since they are not readily available in free agency).

                            Comment

                            • THATHURMANATOR
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 69112

                              #15
                              Re: How can we STILL think we need more OL?

                              This is the same guy clamoring to trade for Roy Williams even though we are 4deep with Solid receivers.....

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X