PDA

View Full Version : Fox Sports: Bills don't move for winning at home, redskins move 11 spots up



Mitchy moo
10-04-2006, 10:53 AM
WTF is wrong with these guys? Washington needed overtime at home to win and we won in regulation so now we get jammed, that's crazy.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/dr_z/10/04/ranks.week4/index.html

THATHURMANATOR
10-04-2006, 10:53 AM
Who cares this has no bearing on our season.

Mitchy moo
10-04-2006, 10:55 AM
Look who they lost to at home Minny , the team we just beat at our house. They beat houston, wow like that isn't a given unless your POS miami.

<TABLE class=tablehead cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=3><TBODY><TR class=oddrow vAlign=top><TD></TD><TD noWrap>Mon, Sep 11</TD><TD>Minnesota (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=min)</TD><TD noWrap>L 16-19 (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=260911028) </TD><TD noWrap>-4</TD><TD noWrap>0-1</TD><TD noWrap>Brunell (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=2485) 163</TD><TD noWrap>Portis (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5937) 39</TD><TD noWrap>Moss (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463) 69</TD></TR><!--gameStatus=3--><TR class=evenrow vAlign=top><TD>2</TD><TD noWrap>Sun, Sep 17</TD><TD>at Dallas (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=dal)</TD><TD noWrap>L 10-27 (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=260917006) </TD><TD noWrap>7</TD><TD noWrap>0-2</TD><TD noWrap>Brunell (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=2485) 197</TD><TD noWrap>Betts (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5942) 40</TD><TD noWrap>Moss (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463) 69</TD></TR><!--gameStatus=3--><TR class=oddrow vAlign=top><TD>3</TD><TD noWrap>Sun, Sep 24</TD><TD>at Houston (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=hou)</TD><TD noWrap>W 31-15 (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=260924034) </TD><TD noWrap>-4</TD><TD noWrap>1-2</TD><TD noWrap>Brunell (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=2485) 261</TD><TD noWrap>Betts (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5942) 124</TD><TD noWrap>Portis (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5937) 78</TD></TR><!--gameStatus=3--><TR class=evenrow vAlign=top><TD>4</TD><TD noWrap>Sun, Oct 1</TD><TD>Jacksonville (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/clubhouse?team=jac)</TD><TD noWrap>W (OT) 36-30 (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=261001028) </TD><TD noWrap>3</TD><TD noWrap>2-2</TD><TD noWrap>Brunell (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=2485) 329</TD><TD noWrap>Portis (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5937) 112</TD><TD noWrap>Moss (http://sports-att.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?statsId=5463) 138</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

THATHURMANATOR
10-04-2006, 10:57 AM
again who cares?

Mitchy moo
10-04-2006, 11:13 AM
I am just saying we have the number one rusher, who had the highest rushing game so far this year and a medium ranked offense / Defense with great ST. I think we would kick washington's *** right now.

THATHURMANATOR
10-04-2006, 11:15 AM
possibly but I don't worry about "experts" ranking.

TigerJ
10-04-2006, 02:29 PM
It does look like he has Washington too high. That will correct itself though. Those rankings are only good for one week.

Carlton Bailey
10-04-2006, 02:30 PM
Let's see how this week goes and then worry about power rankings.