Whos DT's are better?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • justasportsfan
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 71579

    Whos DT's are better?

    CHicago's or Vikes?

    Right now , Chicago's run D is ranked higher than Vikes but Duh Bears played the Browns. No big deal there. Their pass D may be deceiving because the play of the DL affects the passing game.

    If we can do the same things we did with the Vikes to Duh bears, we may have a chance. Keep them off the field and pound Willis all game.

    Our ST will have to play like a no. 1 unit in the league in the return game so our O will have a shorter field to work with. If we can't run, were doomed.

    Here's hoping that Jauron fixes our penalty problems. I doubt we'll beat the Bears but we'll have a fighting chance. They have won their last 8 games at home. Everyone is once again not giving us a chance to pull an upset. They are undefeated. Looks like they are primed for a disappointment. Maybe the bills will surprise once more.

    I Billieve.
    sacrifice1
    https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/
  • Stewie
    Sarah Palin for President... of my pants!
    • Aug 2002
    • 11567

    #2
    Re: Whos DT's are better?

    33-17
    Originally posted by Topdog
    Damn , your're showing you're ignorance!
    Originally posted by mercyrule
    I love Weiner.
    Originally posted by mercyrule
    also cheese

    Comment

    • mikemac2001
      is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
      • Mar 2003
      • 4574

      #3
      Re: Whos DT's are better?

      bills 100 bears 0 dikta 99

      MUCK
      FIAMI

      Comment

      • TigerJ
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 22575

        #4
        Re: Whos DT's are better?

        The DTs for the Bears and the Vikings are very different. It's like trying to compare apples and oranges. Which do you like better? The Bears have smaller, quicker, more athletic DTs. The Vikings have bigger stronger "stuff the middle" type DTs. If Buffalo's linemen are quick enough, and can get their hands up on the Chicago DTs, they will be easier to handle than Phat Pat and Kevin Williams. But if they're not quick enough Tommy Harris is going to be in the Bills backfield disrupting plays all afternoon.
        I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

        I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

        Comment

        • Devin
          The Octagon
          • Apr 2003
          • 23878

          #5
          Re: Whos DT's are better?

          Tommie Harris is an absolute terror. That guy has been unblockable thus far.
          http://gridironjunkies.net/forums/index.php

          Comment

          • BillsPride12
            Registered User
            • Dec 2004
            • 361

            #6
            Re: Whos DT's are better?

            Yeah Tommy Harris is a stud, the type of player I can only hope McCargo turns into.

            Comment

            • ICE74129
              Legendary Zoner
              • Feb 2005
              • 10796

              #7
              Re: Whos DT's are better?

              Originally posted by BillsPride12
              Yeah Tommy Harris is a stud, the type of player I can only hope McCargo turns into.
              Not gonna happen. Tommie started as a freshman at OU and did great against top competition for 4 years. Most of us never heard of mcCargo before last year.

              I still think McCargo can be a damn good rotational player, but Tommie is in a class by himself as for as quick, strong DT's.

              Comment

              • ICE74129
                Legendary Zoner
                • Feb 2005
                • 10796

                #8
                Re: Whos DT's are better?

                Originally posted by TigerJ
                The DTs for the Bears and the Vikings are very different. It's like trying to compare apples and oranges. Which do you like better? The Bears have smaller, quicker, more athletic DTs. The Vikings have bigger stronger "stuff the middle" type DTs. If Buffalo's linemen are quick enough, and can get their hands up on the Chicago DTs, they will be easier to handle than Phat Pat and Kevin Williams. But if they're not quick enough Tommy Harris is going to be in the Bills backfield disrupting plays all afternoon.
                I just don't see us having the strength or speed to stop them. McNally better have better blocking schemes while using mis direction on them

                Comment

                • THATHURMANATOR
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 69112

                  #9
                  Re: Whos DT's are better?

                  Originally posted by ICE74129
                  Not gonna happen. Tommie started as a freshman at OU and did great against top competition for 4 years. Most of us never heard of mcCargo before last year.

                  I still think McCargo can be a damn good rotational player, but Tommie is in a class by himself as for as quick, strong DT's.
                  Agreed!

                  Comment

                  • BillsPride12
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 361

                    #10
                    Re: Whos DT's are better?

                    I agree with that too, thats why I said I can only hope but hey you never know in the NFL

                    Comment

                    • RedEyE
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 24661

                      #11
                      Re: Whos DT's are better?

                      You guys also forget that Villrrial is out for a min. of 3 weeks.

                      Comment

                      • Saratoga Slim
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2005
                        • 4153

                        #12
                        Re: Whos DT's are better?

                        Originally posted by RedEyE
                        You guys also forget that Villrrial is out for a min. of 3 weeks.
                        he is easy to forget.
                        Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

                        Comment

                        • Tatonka
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 21289

                          #13
                          Re: Whos DT's are better?

                          villarial being out actually helps this team.

                          Duke is a better answer.. short and long term.
                          "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

                          Comment

                          • justasportsfan
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 71579

                            #14
                            Re: Whos DT's are better?

                            We have to be successful at going deep if we are going to win this game. We need to spread their D which in turn will allow Willis to run. Against the Vikes we were able to dink and dunk , the bears' D will expect that. We need Parrish to help Evans out.
                            sacrifice1
                            https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                            Comment

                            • John Doe
                              Florida Man
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 2515

                              #15
                              Re: Whos DT's are better?

                              Originally posted by ICE74129
                              Not gonna happen. Tommie started as a freshman at OU and did great against top competition for 4 years. Most of us never heard of mcCargo before last year.

                              I still think McCargo can be a damn good rotational player, but Tommie is in a class by himself as for as quick, strong DT's.
                              Just because McCargo did not play at OU or did not have noteriety in no way proves that he will not be as good as Harris.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X