When stats don't lie

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Cynical
    Maybe?
    • Oct 2003
    • 9766

    When stats don't lie

    Team Statistics
    GBBUF
    First Downs269
    Passing193
    Rushing76
    Penalty00
    Third Down Efficiency7-161-10
    Fourth Down Efficiency0-10-0
    TOTAL NET YARDS427179
    Total Plays7946
    Average Gain Per Play5.43.9
    NET YARDS RUSHING147115
    Rushes3026
    Average Per Rush4.94.4
    NET YARDS PASSING28064
    Completions-Attempts28-478-15
    Yards Per Pass Play5.73.2
    Times Sacked25
    Yards Lost to Sacks738
    Had Intercepted20
    PUNTS68
    Average Punt38.847.4
    PENALTIES48
    Penalty Yards2150
    FUMBLES21
    Fumbles Lost20
  • jmb1099
    Registered User
    • Sep 2004
    • 3354

    #2
    Re: When stats don't lie

    Offense needs to improve hardcore. But we didn't turn it over and that should be proof enough that if we can hold on to the @#$% football than we can win a few.

    Comment

    • Mr. Cynical
      Maybe?
      • Oct 2003
      • 9766

      #3
      Re: When stats don't lie

      Normally the most important stat is the W, but that's when your team is vying for a playoff run. When you are rebuilding the more important stat is how your team is improving. Granted getting the W is a good thing, but the way they did it doesn't make me feel any better about the team moving forward.

      Comment

      • jmb1099
        Registered User
        • Sep 2004
        • 3354

        #4
        Re: When stats don't lie

        Well there were a few positives...
        Anthony Thomas looked good , the left side of the line seemed like it started to gel.

        Comment

        • Nighthawk
          Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
          • Jul 2002
          • 15437

          #5
          Re: When stats don't lie

          Originally posted by Mr. Cynical
          Normally the most important stat is the W, but that's when your team is vying for a playoff run. When you are rebuilding the more important stat is how your team is improving. Granted getting the W is a good thing, but the way they did it doesn't make me feel any better about the team moving forward.
          The only thing that impressed me today was Anthony Thomas. He ran well and looked determined every time he touched the ball. JP on the other hand, looked terrible yet again. His play is not making me feel good about his future.

          Comment

          • Elminster
            #1 Kelsay Fan
            • Oct 2006
            • 928

            #6
            Re: When stats don't lie

            Originally posted by Mr. Cynical
            Normally the most important stat is the W, but that's when your team is vying for a playoff run. When you are rebuilding the more important stat is how your team is improving. Granted getting the W is a good thing, but the way they did it doesn't make me feel any better about the team moving forward.
            I'll tell you what gives me confidence....the whole clutch factor we got going. We actually pulled it together when things were looking grim instead of falling apart. THAT, to me, is a sign of growth, as well as the turnover differential. Our defense made plays....and our offense didn't cough up the ball. I see JP was sacked 5 times....yet he didn't fumble once. And he didn't throw any picks. That's good. At the very least we're back to where we were before the Bears game, and a little better 'cause guys stepped it up...
            Good riddance Fairchild. Of course, the knowledge of your departure will only make TE more hateable than the typical Bills QB. Good luck, hope we don't mess you up like JP.

            Comment

            • Mr. Cynical
              Maybe?
              • Oct 2003
              • 9766

              #7
              Re: When stats don't lie

              Originally posted by Elminster
              I'll tell you what gives me confidence....the whole clutch factor we got going. We actually pulled it together when things were looking grim instead of falling apart. THAT, to me, is a sign of growth, as well as the turnover differential. Our defense made plays....and our offense didn't cough up the ball. I see JP was sacked 5 times....yet he didn't fumble once. And he didn't throw any picks. That's good. At the very least we're back to where we were before the Bears game, and a little better 'cause guys stepped it up...
              Fair enough...I agree with the point that we didn't fold up and stuck it out even though the offense did nothing.

              Comment

              • Yasgur's Farm
                Moderator
                • Feb 2005
                • 7091

                #8
                Re: When stats don't lie

                Originally posted by Nighthawk
                JP on the other hand, looked terrible yet again. His play is not making me feel good about his future.
                15 att's, 8 c's, 102 yd's, 6.8 yd's/att, 1 td, 0 int, 97.1 passer rating, 0 fumbles.

                He was allowed to put the ball up 15 freakin times. Pass plays were initiated 23 times. Take away the 3 scrambles and the 5 sacks and your left with 15 FREAKIN pass plays.

                BTW... I put a stop watch on all 5 sacks... The one near the goal line was 4 seconds before he was hit... Every other sack came in 2 and 3 seconds.

                Comment

                • Nighthawk
                  Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 15437

                  #9
                  Re: When stats don't lie

                  Originally posted by draz54
                  15 att's, 8 c's, 102 yd's, 6.8 yd's/att, 1 td, 0 int, 97.1 passer rating, 0 fumbles.

                  He was allowed to put the ball up 15 freakin times. Pass plays were initiated 23 times. Take away the 3 scrambles and the 5 sacks and your left with 16 FREAKIN pass plays.

                  BTW... I put a stop watch on all 5 sacks... The one near the goal line was 4 seconds before he was hit... Every other sack game in 2 and 3 seconds.
                  Stop...please! He hit a wide open Evans on a blown coverage! Stop acting like he marched them down the field to win.

                  Comment

                  • Yasgur's Farm
                    Moderator
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 7091

                    #10
                    Re: When stats don't lie

                    I'm not saying anything about him marching the team or carrying the team or anything else... Only that he wasn't terrible and had precious few seconds to deliver the ball.

                    Comment

                    • jmb1099
                      Registered User
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 3354

                      #11
                      Re: When stats don't lie

                      Originally posted by Nighthawk
                      Stop...please! He hit a wide open Evans on a blown coverage! Stop acting like he marched them down the field to win.
                      He htt the pass didn't he? Maybe he got lucky, but he hit it and that is that. I wasn't impressed with his overall play today, but he came through in the fourth quarter and made a nice play. No fumbles either.

                      Comment

                      • Nighthawk
                        Getting old waiting for a championship in Buffalo!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 15437

                        #12
                        Re: When stats don't lie

                        Originally posted by jmb1099
                        He htt the pass didn't he? Maybe he got lucky, but he hit it and that is that. I wasn't impressed with his overall play today, but he came through in the fourth quarter and made a nice play. No fumbles either.
                        Dude, he under threw him! If he is not wide open, it's an interception...were watching the same game as me?

                        Comment

                        • HHURRICANE
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 15490

                          #13
                          Re: When stats don't lie

                          Originally posted by draz54
                          15 att's, 8 c's, 102 yd's, 6.8 yd's/att, 1 td, 0 int, 97.1 passer rating, 0 fumbles.

                          He was allowed to put the ball up 15 freakin times. Pass plays were initiated 23 times. Take away the 3 scrambles and the 5 sacks and your left with 15 FREAKIN pass plays.

                          BTW... I put a stop watch on all 5 sacks... The one near the goal line was 4 seconds before he was hit... Every other sack came in 2 and 3 seconds.
                          I'm not sure if people actually watched the game. Our OL sucked yet again and Robert Royal dropped a ball that hit his hands. JP is not the problem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                          Comment

                          • odin
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 85

                            #14
                            Re: When stats don't lie

                            He was under a lot of pressure on the TD pass so of course its not going to be pinpoint accurate.

                            Comment

                            • jmb1099
                              Registered User
                              • Sep 2004
                              • 3354

                              #15
                              Re: When stats don't lie

                              Originally posted by Nighthawk
                              Dude, he under threw him! If he is not wide open, it's an interception...were watching the same game as me?
                              I'm willing to bet you'd complain if I handed you $100 face down.
                              Seriously, no one is saying losman played a great game. But you are trying to discredit every aspect of the game. He saw the open man, threw it to him, we score. I don't care if it isn't as perfect as it could or should have been. Losman needs work, I get it, but he made the right read and threw to the open receiver, what is your problem?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X