Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • raphael120
    Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
    • Oct 2005
    • 5152

    Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

    JP gets benched (would have no idea WHY he would POSSIBLY get benched /sarcasm).

    Nall comes out, also an inexperienced gametime QB.
    Plays behind the same piece of **** O-line.
    And he does BETTER than JP.

    I think it's safe to say then, it IS JP and not just the O-line, but put the right person behind that line, and you can get more production out of that line. Look at Dallas...I'm telling you...we need to see if it's just JP or if it really is the line, or both. See how Romo comes out and produces his PANTS OFF behind that line....If Nall comes in and sucks royally too, then I think you answer a lot of questions. 1)both of ur QB's suck ass, and 2)the Oline is disgusting and we need to focus on that majorly. (which we already know). but im just sayin...if this season is just an experiment, lets experiment with the fact that maybe JP just doesnt have what it takes, and if Nall is the one we should go with. or if we should just clean house...just somethin to think about...
  • THATHURMANATOR
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 69112

    #2
    Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

    How could we not admit it was JPs fault?

    Nalls wife was in the paper. HOT STUFF.

    Comment

    • raphael120
      Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
      • Oct 2005
      • 5152

      #3
      Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

      bet she can play nall ball well. ahaha

      Comment

      • Saratoga Slim
        Registered User
        • Jul 2005
        • 4154

        #4
        Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

        I think I just read that JP got sacked on 4 of 17 pass attempts this weekend. That suggests to me that pass protection is a fairly large problem on this team. I guess I agree with you in theory (that if Nall came in and played better than JP has, that might ndicate JP's the culprit for our crappy offense).

        Here's the problem: Nall is LESS mobile than JP by all accounts. Dallas put in a MORE mobile QB when Drew was taking a ton of sacks. Thus, I don't see Nall having any more success than JP at getting rid of the ball in time.
        Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

        Comment

        • Devin
          The Octagon
          • Apr 2003
          • 23878

          #5
          Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

          Ultimatley thats probably a decent litmus test.

          Throw Holcomb or Nall behind this pathetic line and see what happens.

          Of course it also doesnt change how bad the line is.
          http://gridironjunkies.net/forums/index.php

          Comment

          • raphael120
            Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
            • Oct 2005
            • 5152

            #6
            Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

            thats true...but apparently the coaching staff is not letting JP use his legs...which is ******ed if you ask me...i know you're trying to develop the kid, but damn, give him a line that gives him enough time to turn his damn head around after he drops back to LOOK at the defence before he get's slammed into the ground. even when JP completed those passes, he was STILL on his ass whenever the camera went back to him....it's just rediculous...i really believe it is only the line this past Indy game...i did not once say to myself DAMMIT JP YOU HELD IT TOO LONG...but i did say that a lot at the GB and Lions game....but it wasj ust horrid what i saw, oline play wise on sunday

            Comment

            • justasportsfan
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 71579

              #7
              Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

              Originally posted by raphael120
              JP gets benched (would have no idea WHY he would POSSIBLY get benched /sarcasm).

              Nall comes out, also an inexperienced gametime QB.
              Plays behind the same piece of **** O-line.
              And he does BETTER than JP.

              I think it's safe to say then, it IS JP and not just the O-line, but put the right person behind that line, and you can get more production out of that line. Look at Dallas...I'm telling you...we need to see if it's just JP or if it really is the line, or both. See how Romo comes out and produces his PANTS OFF behind that line....If Nall comes in and sucks royally too, then I think you answer a lot of questions. 1)both of ur QB's suck ass, and 2)the Oline is disgusting and we need to focus on that majorly. (which we already know). but im just sayin...if this season is just an experiment, lets experiment with the fact that maybe JP just doesnt have what it takes, and if Nall is the one we should go with. or if we should just clean house...just somethin to think about...

              Nall hasn't even been able to take KH's spot as the 2nd string qb.
              sacrifice1
              https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

              Comment

              • Iehoshua
                Registered User
                • Jan 2003
                • 12906

                #8
                Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                If they're going to bench JP, I would much rather play Nall than Holcomb.

                Comment

                • PECKERWOOD
                  Defies all logic
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 13170

                  #9
                  Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                  Originally posted by Devin
                  Ultimatley thats probably a decent litmus test.

                  Throw Holcomb or Nall behind this pathetic line and see what happens.

                  Of course it also doesnt change how bad the line is.
                  Then the bashers would say: "Nall or Holcomb needs more time! He isnt fully accustomed to the starting lineup!!" Really, it would just flip flop. The bashers would become the supporters, and the supporters would then become bashers.

                  Comment

                  • Romes
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 5766

                    #10
                    Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                    Craig Nall = Travis Brown
                    Originally posted by paladin warrior
                    RALPH is drove me nut.

                    Comment

                    • Inetpub
                      i'm a tool
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 489

                      #11
                      Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                      Im all for putting another QB in there. But Nall isnt the answer. Putting another rookie in there is starting from square 1. He hasnt even beaten Kelly as #2. I would nt consider Nall. A Descent FA ya. Nall, no.
                      That proves NOTHING about Losman

                      Comment

                      • Kerr
                        Hall of Fame Zoner
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 6656

                        #12
                        Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                        **** nall.

                        Comment

                        • YardRat
                          Well, lookie here...
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 86179

                          #13
                          Re: Hypothetical Nall Ball Situation...

                          It wouldn't change anything. Holcomb outplayed Losman last year and they played behind the same line. There will still be 'reasons' (read: excuses) that some will dig up to dispute the results.
                          YardRat Wall of Fame
                          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X