Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490

    Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

    Eric Moulds numbers are worse in Houston than in Buffalo. So much for JP being the problem. However, we need a #2 receiver. Someone big and strong.
  • jamze132
    Registered User
    • Jun 2003
    • 29290

    #2
    Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

    Moulds wore out his welcome here with his mouth. I don't blame the guy for wanting to win at all though. But I just don't understand why he went to the owrst team in the NFL, according to last season. I think he just wanted out of Buffalo.

    But in his defense, he has taken a lot of pressure off of Andre Johnson.

    Comment

    • bennprince
      Registered User
      • Nov 2006
      • 20

      #3
      Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

      Moulds is the second receiver in Houston. In case you haven't noticed, the number one guy (Andre Johnson) leads the league in receptions and yardage.

      Comment

      • BillsNick
        Registered User
        • Jul 2003
        • 3898

        #4
        Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

        Moulds is why Johnson is having his best season.

        Comment

        • HHURRICANE
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 15490

          #5
          Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

          Originally posted by BillsNick
          Moulds is why Johnson is having his best season.
          Nobody reads post around here. I didn't say that Moulds sucks. I said that for all of the *****ing he did here he's getting the ball less and he's still on a losing team. Keeping Moulds here at 33 was a no brainer.

          Comment

          • BillsNick
            Registered User
            • Jul 2003
            • 3898

            #6
            Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

            Originally posted by HHURRICANE
            Nobody reads post around here. I didn't say that Moulds sucks. I said that for all of the *****ing he did here he's getting the ball less and he's still on a losing team. Keeping Moulds here at 33 was a no brainer.

            Apparently you read too much into my post. All I said is that Moulds is why Johnson is having his best year.

            Comment

            • HHURRICANE
              Registered User
              • Mar 2005
              • 15490

              #7
              Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

              Originally posted by BillsNick
              Apparently you read too much into my post. All I said is that Moulds is why Johnson is having his best year.
              I replied to the wrong post. My bad.

              Comment

              • Lee-83
                Pro Bowl Bound
                • Oct 2006
                • 106

                #8
                Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                obviously he's a #2 there, and don't even say he was a #2 here!

                Comment

                • Saratoga Slim
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 4154

                  #9
                  Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                  I for one would rather have Moulds opposite Evans than Price, Reed or Davis.
                  Wake up, brush your teeth, and get ready for a day of hating the Dolphins. Or the Pats? How to choose?

                  Comment

                  • The_Philster
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 52180

                    #10
                    Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                    Originally posted by Saratoga Slim
                    I for one would rather have Moulds opposite Evans than Price, Reed or Davis.
                    Ditto...Moulds could get open..something that our current WRs, except Evans, seem unable to do with much consistency
                    The Buffalo Pro Cheer Blog...Positive coverage of Buffalo's Pro Cheerleaders since 2001!

                    Comment

                    • justasportsfan
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 71579

                      #11
                      Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                      I disagree, We're obviously feeling the loss. He however wanted to leave so chiao.

                      As for his nos. , he was going to be a no. 2 over there and he knew it. Doesn't mean he wouldn't have helped us out. He may not be able to stretch the field anymore but he would've been hard to guard on one on one. He could've caused problems up the middle and Evans would've been free to go deep. Now you see Evans catching for 5 -15 yds out because htere's no one else other than Reed.
                      sacrifice1
                      https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

                      Comment

                      • DynaPaul
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 7540

                        #12
                        Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                        I woulda liked to keep him. To make matters worse he isn't making much more dime there than in Buffalo. Also, he did say he was tired of losing but c'mon... the Texans? They are in no way a "team on the rise". It's sad that his career is ending on that pathetic team rather than in Buffalo.

                        Comment

                        • Yasgur's Farm
                          Moderator
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 7091

                          #13
                          Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                          It would be great having EMo here to compliment Lee Evans. But, EMo wanted #1 money to stay with the Bills... And settled for #2 money to leave. His stats vs Lee Evans proves he's now a number 2. Lee's stats are clearly better while being double covered while EMo's enjoying 1 on 1 for the most part.

                          Comment

                          • Gunzlingr
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 45976

                            #14
                            Re: Not keeping Moulds was an obvious good move!!

                            I think we should have went after Keyshawn. Somebody big like that that isn't afraid to play even when he isn't getting the ball.
                            You think you're hot **** in a champagne glass, but you're really cold diarrhea in a Dixie cup!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X