Redskins want...

[Devin]

Clements apparently.

Redskins sources indicate the team is likely to ask several veterans -- perhaps CB Shawn Springs, QB Mark Brunell, DE Renaldo Wynn and ORT Jon Jansen -- to redo their deals in order to clear up cap space to make a run at some free-agent defenders. The apple of their eye reportedly is Bills CB Nate Clements.

Thats a bidding war we wont win.

God I hope Greg Williams gets hit by a bus and gets herpes.....from a dude.

[gr8slayer]

Re: Redskins want...

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! I want to keep Nasty Nate. If he leaves we will almost surely use a high pick on a CB.

[Devin]

Re: Redskins want...

We would likely have to.

CB's like any other year are going to get stupid deals. I dont see any other way honestly.

[ShadowHawk7]

Re: Redskins want...

Yeah, I just read that on Insider as well..
Tag, then trade. Screw any promises previously made, we could definitely get an extra first rounder here at worst!

[gr8slayer]

Re: Redskins want...

We would likely have to.

CB's like any other year are going to get stupid deals. I dont see any other way honestly.

I say we pay the man. He is a top tier CB in the AFC.

[Mitchy moo]

Re: Redskins want...

Yeah, I just read that on Insider as well..
Tag, then trade. Screw any promises previously made, we could definitely get an extra first rounder here at worst!

If we make the playoffs and he is a direct cause of it, pay the man.

[Devin]

Re: Redskins want...

Its a matter of desire I think.

Marv/Ralph likely made up thier minds about Clements prior to making that verbal promise. At any rate even if they offer him a legit deal its a matter of Nate actually wanting to be here.

Honestly while I know the players union would be all over it, id say screw it and tag/trade him anyway.

[Gunzlingr]

Re: Redskins want...

You reneg on a deal like that, and you might as well close up shop. Who would want to come here if you can't trust what you have been told by the GM/Owner?

[Devin]

Re: Redskins want...

You reneg on a deal like that, and you might as well close up shop. Who would want to come here if you can't trust what you have been told by the GM/Owner?

yeah guess thats true.

Ah well.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Redskins want...

Blah. Get a dominant DT and our Dl will make our db's llok better than they are. Screw Clements.

[DynaPaul]

Re: Redskins want...

Pay for Nate but don't overpay I say. If Dan Snyder just HAS to have him for his underachieving fantasy team than so be it...

[kernowboy]

Re: Redskins want...

If they sign Clements and keep Springs won't that make Rogers and Rumph surplus? I think if we get more help on the DL, either could be a stop gap until Youboty works into the role

[X-Era]

Re: Redskins want...

Clements apparently.



Thats a bidding war we wont win.

God I hope Greg Williams gets hit by a bus and gets herpes.....from a dude.

Deal with Nate, give him a chance to get a deal done before FA hits, if he insists on hitting the market, TAG AND TRADE!!!! I dont care about our promise. We only promised not to tag him again if we were going to then KEEP him, he shouldnt care if we want to trade him and get something out of it.

Like I said, we should pay attention to OUR team not Nate. Give him a chance to do the right thing and sign a long term deal with us before the start of FA, force him to be a Bill and not an individual. If he opts to try to make more cash, we should opt to treat him as a number and tag and trade.

[X-Era]

Re: Redskins want...

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! I want to keep Nasty Nate. If he leaves we will almost surely use a high pick on a CB.

You can set THAT pick in stone if Nate leaves, a D minded coach, bet your ass he will get a lock down corner in round 1. I think it would be Hall or McCauley, maybe Cason.

[Bling]

Re: Redskins want...

We hear in Miami would love Nate. Our CB spot is severely lacking and could use a good #1 like Nate. Plus it'll finally get that INT machine off the Bills.