Tag and trade Nate for....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    Tag and trade Nate for....

    NEW ORLEANS — The stage was set for yet another dismal Sunday afternoon with the Washington Redskins.


    scroll down.

    Clinton Portis may be on his way out.

    Washington, as previosuly posted wants Nate.

    Would you tag and trade Nate for Portis?

    Clinton is the proven RB Willis wishes he could be. Clintos a bit more of a head case, but is a better player too.

  • Bling
    Registered User
    • Jul 2004
    • 13022

    #2
    Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

    So Was is trading Champ Bailey for Nate Clements?

    Comment

    • Mitchy moo
      Roways rooking ahread!
      • Sep 2005
      • 18380

      #3
      Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

      Willis is going to show his worth in the playoffs, the real money games.

      Comment

      • X-Era
        What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
        • Feb 2005
        • 27670

        #4
        Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

        Originally posted by Bling
        So Was is trading Champ Bailey for Nate Clements?
        Agreed, it would seem silly, but it IS Washington.

        If they covet Nate, and wouldnt mind dealing Portis, would we do it?

        We would have to be convinced that Willis isnt the answer, Im not sure we are yet.

        Comment

        • ParanoidAndroid
          My battery is low and it's getting dark.
          • Apr 2004
          • 16862

          #5
          Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

          Creating a hole where there is none. Sign Nate! He's earned it.

          Comment

          • X-Era
            What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
            • Feb 2005
            • 27670

            #6
            Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

            Originally posted by andyxc71
            Creating a hole where there is none. Sign Nate! He's earned it.
            I agree with you, but many here think he will walk.

            Comment

            • deathadder
              Registered User
              • Mar 2003
              • 304

              #7
              Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

              We can't tag Nate. This has been discussed many times. He and the Bills came to an agreement that the Bills will not use their tag on him next year. That was signed and delivered. Face it, NATE IS AS GOOD AS GONE!
              http://www.gizmogamer.com - Your #1 source for the latest gaming, gadgets, and technology news!

              Comment

              • G. Host
                Banned
                • Jul 2002
                • 10298

                #8
                Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                I believe the Bills said they would not franchise him in a verbal agreement but I believe they can tag him giving them right to match offers like we got Spikes.

                Comment

                • OpIv37
                  Acid Douching Asswipe
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 101313

                  #9
                  Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                  Originally posted by andyxc71
                  Creating a hole where there is none. Sign Nate! He's earned it.
                  it doesn't matter. He wants to get paid and we'll get outbid. Clements is gone- we need to accept it.
                  MiKiDo Facebook
                  MiKiDo Website

                  Comment

                  • raphael120
                    Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 5152

                    #10
                    Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                    I don't know about you guys, but Portis is just weirder version of McGahee...though he would be pretty friggin hilarious with those wigs and masks.

                    Comment

                    • PECKERWOOD
                      Defies all logic
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 13170

                      #11
                      Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                      Nate is gone, we can't franchise him.

                      Comment

                      • TacklingDummy
                        Unreachable Douche
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 71725

                        #12
                        Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                        Originally posted by BuffaloFever
                        Nate is gone, we can't franchise him.

                        $33+ million in cap space. We don't need to franchise him. Just friggin sign him.
                        It's not like Buffalo is going to go out and make this huge splash in Free Agency next year.

                        Comment

                        • PECKERWOOD
                          Defies all logic
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 13170

                          #13
                          Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                          Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                          $33+ million in cap space. We don't need to franchise him. Just friggin sign him.
                          It's not like Buffalo is going to go out and make this huge splash in Free Agency next year.
                          Thank you for proving my point. Nate is going to demand Champ Bailey type of money and with a bazillion teams 20 + million dollars in cap space, he is going to get it.

                          Comment

                          • TacklingDummy
                            Unreachable Douche
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 71725

                            #14
                            Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                            Originally posted by BuffaloFever
                            Thank you for proving my point. Nate is going to demand Champ Bailey type of money and with a bazillion teams 20 + million dollars in cap space, he is going to get it.
                            And with $33 million in cap room there should be no reason why the Bills can't be the ones who sign Nate.

                            Comment

                            • PECKERWOOD
                              Defies all logic
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 13170

                              #15
                              Re: Tag and trade Nate for....

                              Originally posted by TacklingDummy
                              And with $33 million in cap room there should be no reason why the Bills can't be the ones who sign Nate.
                              We actually have closer to 40 million in cap space, but many teams are around the 30 million cap range.

                              The Bills don't make big splashes in FA, you said it yourself. So what makes you think that we will resign the best CB and one of the top defenders available in FA? It makes no sense.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X