G. Host
12-23-2006, 02:17 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2705569
Green Bay and Milwaukee are considered home markets for the Packers, allowing a local over-the-air TV station to simulcast the NFL Network's broadcast. The same was true in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
In many other Wisconsin cities, most notably the capital of Madison, Packers fans who don't get the NFL Network weren't able to see the game in their homes.
it is rubbish that NFL insists that it be on a non-premium tier IMO. If a game would be blocked out (as it would be in Madison if game was not a sellout) it should be shown on regular TV. NFL is getting too greedy.
If it was a Bills game would they insist Bills home market is Buffalo & Rochester making fans in Southern Ontario and Syracuse not be able to watch the game unless they got NFL network?
Green Bay and Milwaukee are considered home markets for the Packers, allowing a local over-the-air TV station to simulcast the NFL Network's broadcast. The same was true in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
In many other Wisconsin cities, most notably the capital of Madison, Packers fans who don't get the NFL Network weren't able to see the game in their homes.
it is rubbish that NFL insists that it be on a non-premium tier IMO. If a game would be blocked out (as it would be in Madison if game was not a sellout) it should be shown on regular TV. NFL is getting too greedy.
If it was a Bills game would they insist Bills home market is Buffalo & Rochester making fans in Southern Ontario and Syracuse not be able to watch the game unless they got NFL network?