Ebenezer
01-05-2007, 01:24 AM
Do you really think the NHL will realign? The Red Wings don't want to play games out west...the west wants to see the young superstars that are in the east...Atlanta doesn't want to move to the West...Pittsburgh could move and throw off the league balance...I sat down and tried to come up with a plan for realignment that might make sense...let me know what you think - I am sure it would NEVER get implemented.
Eastern Conference
Atlantic Division - Pitts out and Wash in to make a true Atlantic coast conference
NYR
NYI
NJ
Wash
Philly
NE Division - Stays the same
Boston
Buff
Ott
Mont
Tor
Central Conference - Less travel for Midwest Teams
Midwest Division - Pitts in and Nashville out
Detroit
*Pitts
Chicago
St. Louis
Columbus
SE Division - Wash out and Nash in makes for even stronger SE rivalries (call it the NASCAR division)
Atl
Fla
TB
Nash
Carolina
Western Conference
Mountain Division - Stays the same
Colo
*Minn
Calgary
Edmonton
Dallas
Pacific Division - Stays the same
LA
Ana
SJ
Van
Phoenix
*-Should Pitts move to KC or Winnipeg they would flip flop divisions with Minnesota
Regular Season 82 games:
8 games against each team in division = 32
4 games against each team in other division within conference = 20
3 games against each team in other two conferences (rotating home/away)= 30
Playoffs -
18 teams make playoffs instead of 16
Total possible games increases from 105 to 121 (increasing gate and TV revenues and generating more money for league and players)
Each conference would have 2 division winners and the teams with the next 4 best records would be the wild card teams. Teams are ranked 1-6. All division winners get a bye. Wild card teams play best of 7 (Wild Card Round - 3vs6, 4v5). Wild card winners play division winners (Divisional Round - 1vlowest seed, 2vsecond lowest seed). The two remaining teams play for confernece title (Conference Round). Each conference sends winner to 9 game round robin tournament (Each team would play 6 total games - 3 against each team). Best two records play for Stanley Cup - best of seven).
Thoughts?
Eastern Conference
Atlantic Division - Pitts out and Wash in to make a true Atlantic coast conference
NYR
NYI
NJ
Wash
Philly
NE Division - Stays the same
Boston
Buff
Ott
Mont
Tor
Central Conference - Less travel for Midwest Teams
Midwest Division - Pitts in and Nashville out
Detroit
*Pitts
Chicago
St. Louis
Columbus
SE Division - Wash out and Nash in makes for even stronger SE rivalries (call it the NASCAR division)
Atl
Fla
TB
Nash
Carolina
Western Conference
Mountain Division - Stays the same
Colo
*Minn
Calgary
Edmonton
Dallas
Pacific Division - Stays the same
LA
Ana
SJ
Van
Phoenix
*-Should Pitts move to KC or Winnipeg they would flip flop divisions with Minnesota
Regular Season 82 games:
8 games against each team in division = 32
4 games against each team in other division within conference = 20
3 games against each team in other two conferences (rotating home/away)= 30
Playoffs -
18 teams make playoffs instead of 16
Total possible games increases from 105 to 121 (increasing gate and TV revenues and generating more money for league and players)
Each conference would have 2 division winners and the teams with the next 4 best records would be the wild card teams. Teams are ranked 1-6. All division winners get a bye. Wild card teams play best of 7 (Wild Card Round - 3vs6, 4v5). Wild card winners play division winners (Divisional Round - 1vlowest seed, 2vsecond lowest seed). The two remaining teams play for confernece title (Conference Round). Each conference sends winner to 9 game round robin tournament (Each team would play 6 total games - 3 against each team). Best two records play for Stanley Cup - best of seven).
Thoughts?