Correct me if I am wrong but in Aikman's first two seasons of being a starter .. he went 0-11 in a 1-15 first season and then 7-7 in his second year helped especially with the drafting of a certain Emmett Smith and the bringing together of a much more effective OL.
Now forgive my maths, but certain alleged fans have been complaining about a 8-16 starting record after being a starter for two years ... surely this is superior to a 7-18 starting record over a similar period of time when this guy has a far superior running back to McGahee
Just a thought ....
Now forgive my maths, but certain alleged fans have been complaining about a 8-16 starting record after being a starter for two years ... surely this is superior to a 7-18 starting record over a similar period of time when this guy has a far superior running back to McGahee
Just a thought ....
Comment