OJ or Thurman

[Fatwhite02]

Who would you fellas rathre have in the prime of their careers.

Personally I would rather have Thurman because he brought more dimensions to our offense.

[Bulldog]

I would rather have O.J. because he had that killer instinct!

[TypicalBill]

:lol:

[TypicalBill]

Id go with TT, Defenses were more complex when he played. His ability to catch the ball out of the backfield was amazing.

[Pride]

I loved watching Thurman line up as a split end, hustle down the field, make a great catch, and break tackles into the endzone.

One of maybe 5 RB's that could do that so well

[Voltron]

If you watch film OJ was a WAY better runner that thurman. Oh yeah and OJ didn't CHOKE when went to the big games. I would take OJ over TT any day. That man did what a running back was supposed to do. RUN the football!

He is a scumbag but a hell of a football player in the day

[THATHURMANATOR]

"If you watch film OJ was a WAY better runner that thurman. Oh yeah and OJ didn't CHOKE when went to the big games"

And what big games did OJ play in??? I seem to remember Thurman having one of the best running games in superbowl history in superbowl 25.

[Voltron]

I seem to remember the words "FUMBLE by Thomas" coming up a lot in at least 2 of the Super bowls. OJ played in playoff and the AFL championship game if I am not mistaken. If I am then I apologize. I don't have time to look it up.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Yeah Thurman had two fumbles. What are ya gonna do. Thurman is tied for the all time playoff touchdown lead. Far from a choker. The entire team stunk the final 3 superbowls.

[The_Philster]

OJ was a better pure runner but Thurman was a better all around back.

[BillsNYC]

oj...

[THATHURMANATOR]

There is no question that OJ was a better pure runner but Thurman was no slouch at all plus he was a great receiver which added that extra element!

[Billz_fan]

TT :up:

brought a much more all around game to the table.



Now I think OJ was a better runner. But that wasn't the question ;)