Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

[OpIv37]

First, Fletch said he wants to leave and Marv seems to be building for youth so I don't see him throwing bags of money at a 32 year old MLB. Therefore I'm assuming he's gone.

Now, onto the rest of it. Say Marv decides not to re-sign Nate and we go after Briggs and Samuel. We get outbid in both cases. Meanwhile, Nate leaves. In the draft, both Okoye and Willis are gone before our pick.

Basically, this means we will go into next season trying to plug our existing defensive holes plus the loss of Nate and Fletcher with the guys on our roster, whatever we can scrounge together in the draft and maybe a few FA "role players" (like the ones that worked SO well for us last year- Price, Royal, Reyes, etc).

(BTW, I don't think the loss of Nate will hurt us too bad IF and ONLY IF we fix the pass rush and run D to take pressure off the corners).

Bottom-line: we are in desperate need of a playmaker or two on D, and there's a good chance we won't be able to get one this off-season. If that happens, we'll be lucky to go 7-9 next year.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

I cant say this is the worst possible outcome without outlining the other 9 picks prior to ours. If Willis and Okoye are both game at 12 then likely somebody will have fallen.

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

I cant say this is the worst possible outcome without outlining the other 9 picks prior to ours. If Willis and Okoye are both game at 12 then likely somebody will have fallen.

anyone who plays DT or LB?

We do need a receiving threat on the offensive side of the ball to compliment Evans and could use help on the right side of the OL (although I think we need someone proven and not a draft pick for the OL). But I don't think it's going to matter much if we can't fix the run D. Plus draft picks take time to develop, and with our schedule we can't even afford to blow a couple of games if we want a legit shot at the playoffs.

[Jan Reimers]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

I don't think it's all that bleak. Based on the quality of our draft last year (Whitner, Simpson, Williams, Ellison and Pennington all contributed, and Merz shows some promise), I would have to think the brain trust knew what they were doing with McCargo and Youboty. I expect that they will play key roles this year.

Their emergence will allow us to concentrate a little more on other areas in the draft and FA. I'll bet we get at least one quality LB, RB, WR and O lineman, and perhaps a better TE and some help in the secondary and the D line.

[Devin]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

Merz shows some promise

MERZ!!!

[DraftBoy]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

anyone who plays DT or LB?

We do need a receiving threat on the offensive side of the ball to compliment Evans and could use help on the right side of the OL (although I think we need someone proven and not a draft pick for the OL). But I don't think it's going to matter much if we can't fix the run D. Plus draft picks take time to develop, and with our schedule we can't even afford to blow a couple of games if we want a legit shot at the playoffs.

DT and LB will not fix the run D alone. We still need a CB, and a DE. Thats the reason I say it really decides on the other 9 picks. For instance if Branch, or Adams falls. If Jarrett is avail, if Anderson is avail. Hall, Revis, or Hughes could all be picks. Really the first 11 picks matter not just 2 of them.

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

DT and LB will not fix the run D alone. We still need a CB, and a DE. Thats the reason I say it really decides on the other 9 picks. For instance if Branch, or Adams falls. If Jarrett is avail, if Anderson is avail. Hall, Revis, or Hughes could all be picks. Really the first 11 picks matter not just 2 of them.

DT and LB could more than tighten up the run D- it wouldn't be perfect but it could possibly be passable. If the DT is disruptive in the backfield, that will help the pass rush and make corner less of a priority.

The point is that we need a lot of help on D. If we lose Clements and Fletcher, don't get Briggs or Samuel or any other playmaker, and pick Jarrett in round 1, our D is going to be the same or worst as last year.

I don't think we can rely on McCargo and Youboty. McCargo didn't show much before his injury, and after the same injury two years in a row, that has to be a concern. I'm not completely discounting the possibility of him becoming a force, but it's a chance- if he doesn't come through, we're ****ed on the DL for the 3rd straight year.

As far as Youboty, he managed to get on the field as nickel in one game after a string of injuries. Even if he does start, he's gonna take his lumps for a while first.

No matter how you look at it, we need playmakers on D NOW to have a shot at the playoffs. Where are we going to get them?

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

look, the team made significant progress last year and that's encouraging, but it was also obvious that we're not there yet. I'd hate to see another off-season of signing the Royals and Reyes' of the league because we can't attract top talent.

[DraftBoy]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

DT and LB could more than tighten up the run D- it wouldn't be perfect but it could possibly be passable. If the DT is disruptive in the backfield, that will help the pass rush and make corner less of a priority.

The point is that we need a lot of help on D. If we lose Clements and Fletcher, don't get Briggs or Samuel or any other playmaker, and pick Jarrett in round 1, our D is going to be the same or worst as last year.

I don't think we can rely on McCargo and Youboty. McCargo didn't show much before his injury, and after the same injury two years in a row, that has to be a concern. I'm not completely discounting the possibility of him becoming a force, but it's a chance- if he doesn't come through, we're ****ed on the DL for the 3rd straight year.

As far as Youboty, he managed to get on the field as nickel in one game after a string of injuries. Even if he does start, he's gonna take his lumps for a while first.

No matter how you look at it, we need playmakers on D NOW to have a shot at the playoffs. Where are we going to get them?

I direct you to read the "study" I did on our run D, it was in a thread I made. Basically it said that our run D gave up more ypc to the outside then the inside. The LB and DT you propose would help out inside run D and not our outside. So Im not sure how much a new DT and ILB actually help our run D, since it ignores that we are still going to give up a ton of the yards to the outside.

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

I direct you to read the "study" I did on our run D, it was in a thread I made. Basically it said that our run D gave up more ypc to the outside then the inside. The LB and DT you propose would help out inside run D and not our outside. So Im not sure how much a new DT and ILB actually help our run D, since it ignores that we are still going to give up a ton of the yards to the outside.

then why would we re-sign Clements? $25 million guaranteed for a guy who can't come up in run support? **** that.

Oh, and the defensive system also calls for getting pressure on the passer. Our DT's were awful at that.

And let's say you're right- we need a DT and OLB who can play the run, or a corner who's better at run support. Who? Samuel? Cato June? What if we get outbid on those guys, which is also entirely possible?

Either way, a lot needs to be done to fix this D and with the guys available and the number of teams with cap room, I don't see how it's going to get done.

[Tatonka]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

op, i know your into "keeping it real"... but sometime that really comes across as "grumpy cuz there is sand in my vagina."

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

op, i know your into "keeping it real"... but sometime that really comes across as "grumpy cuz there is sand in my vagina."

I'm surprised it took this long for someone to make a comment of this sort....

I should probably just stay out of the Bills forum this time of year. I just see people throwing names around- Clements, Briggs, Freeney, Samuel, Fletcher, trading up, trading down, etc- everyone has a different opinion of what we should do, and I can't help but wonder what happens if none of it gets done.

I think it's going to be hard to attract the big name FA's in the posiitions we need, but it's clear that we need to get some help from somewhere.

[Tatonka]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

i know we need help.. and so do the bills. they have acknowledged that..

but there is no need is assuming that we wont get ANYONE..

your scenario basically says.. "we will get no good FAs and we will get screwed on EVERYONE that could help us in the draft and get NO ONE that is any good".

there is no sense assuming the worst right now.. what is the point.. if it happens, then we can all ***** about it together!

[OpIv37]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

there is no sense assuming the worst right now.. what is the point.. if it happens, then we can all ***** about it together!

fair enough

[raphael120]

Re: Worst case (but plausible) off-season scenario

i just hope when these words are said "And with the 14th pick in the 2007 NFL draft, the Buffalo Bills chose..."

It won't be followed by the same response i gave last year:

Jaw drop. "Who the **** is that!?!"