PDA

View Full Version : OJ #12


eyedog
02-14-2007, 09:21 PM
OJ and his 2003 yds in 1973. Considering his off the field problems I'm suprised they even put him in there.
YardRat
02-14-2007, 09:31 PM
#12 what? Who are 'they' and what is 'there'?
eyedog
02-14-2007, 09:52 PM
ESPN show "Who is #1". The show is about an athletes best individual years. Marino in 1984 was #9 I believe. Manning in 2004 was around #14.
Jan Reimers
02-15-2007, 08:43 AM
What do OJ's off field problems have to do with his on field performance 20 plus years earlier?
HHURRICANE
02-15-2007, 09:25 AM
OJ and his 2003 yds in 1973. Considering his off the field problems I'm suprised they even put him in there.

OJ's performance is better than #12. He did it with 2 less games and everybody forgets that. That's 143 yards of rushing per game. We jump for joy when Mcgahee has 2 games a year with 143 yards in it.
Night Train
02-15-2007, 09:38 AM
OJ's performance is better than #12. He did it with 2 less games and everybody forgets that. That's 143 yards of rushing per game. We jump for joy when Mcgahee has 2 games a year with 143 yards in it.

Yes but how can one argue with the Ego Sports Entertainment Network, the worldwide leader in sports ?

Booyah!
eyedog
02-15-2007, 12:14 PM
What do OJ's off field problems have to do with his on field performance 20 plus years earlier?


Nothing at all. It just has been my perception that sports outlets really don't go out of their way to acknowledge what a great runner OJ was, and I think a lot of that has to do with his off the field problems.
I laugh when I see many on this board who actually think Thurman was better than OJ.