Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dr. Lecter
    Zero for Zero!
    • Mar 2003
    • 67946

    Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???



    RFA ANSWER: I noticed some Bills fans were discussing Colts RFA OL Jake Scott, who if given a low tender ($850K) by the Colts would require just a 5th round pick as compensation if signed away from Indy with an offer sheet.

    But the Bills don't have a fifth round pick, so what would happen. I've found out that what would happen is Buffalo would be out of luck. If you don't have the proper draft pick as compensation you can't sign the player to an offer sheet.


    That sucks.
    Originally posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490

    #2
    Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

    Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
    http://buffalobills.com/blog/index.jsp?post_id=1005

    RFA ANSWER: I noticed some Bills fans were discussing Colts RFA OL Jake Scott, who if given a low tender ($850K) by the Colts would require just a 5th round pick as compensation if signed away from Indy with an offer sheet.

    But the Bills don't have a fifth round pick, so what would happen. I've found out that what would happen is Buffalo would be out of luck. If you don't have the proper draft pick as compensation you can't sign the player to an offer sheet.


    That sucks.
    And now I'm hearing that we aren't resigning Hargrove. Before we annoit Marv as the "best GM ever" let's keep track of crap like this, the Clements promise, and the McCargo pick after signing Tripplett.

    Comment

    • gr8slayer
      Registered User
      • Feb 2005
      • 20796

      #3
      Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

      Wow.

      Comment

      • Dr. Lecter
        Zero for Zero!
        • Mar 2003
        • 67946

        #4
        Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

        Originally posted by HHURRICANE
        And now I'm hearing that we aren't resigning Hargrove. Before we annoit Marv as the "best GM ever" let's keep track of crap like this, the Clements promise, and the McCargo pick after signing Tripplett.
        Where did you hear that about Hargrove?

        And nobody annoited him teh best GM ever.

        And there is nothing wrong with the McCargo pick. The system used is a rotational system. They need both guys.
        Originally posted by mysticsoto
        Lecter is right in everything he said.

        Comment

        • HHURRICANE
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 15490

          #5
          Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

          Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
          Where did you hear that about Hargrove?

          And nobody annoited him teh best GM ever.

          And there is nothing wrong with the McCargo pick. The system used is a rotational system. They need both guys.
          Yardrat just posted it on another thread.

          Comment

          • Dr. Lecter
            Zero for Zero!
            • Mar 2003
            • 67946

            #6
            Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

            That was kinda covered as he also read that Hargrove was inactive at the end of the year, which is untrue.
            Originally posted by mysticsoto
            Lecter is right in everything he said.

            Comment

            • clumping platelets

              #7
              Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

              Hargrove played in every game he was a Buffalo Bill

              Comment

              • patmoran2006
                Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                • Dec 2005
                • 19840

                #8
                Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                Where did you hear that about Hargrove?

                And nobody annoited him teh best GM ever.

                And there is nothing wrong with the McCargo pick. The system used is a rotational system. They need both guys.
                That sucks and it figures (about Scott)-- nothing is going right thus far. I am actually more scared about this coming week than excited.

                As for McCargo.. Bull****. They sign their "biggest" deal to a specific type of DT, and then TRADE Up in round one to draft the exact same player. Given that they knew they wouldn't pay fletcher this year, they could've used that pick on DeMarco Ryans, or they could've went with the safe pick, drafting a beast of a center in Nick Mangold.

                Im not hating on McCargo.. He may turn out to be a good player, and overall I think the draft was really solid.. But this pick was stupid and it was senseless compared to other needs.


                Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                Comment

                • clumping platelets

                  #9
                  Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                  The original premise is not true..........Bills can reaquire their 5th rd pick OR a higher pick in the 5th rd and then tender Scott as a RFA

                  Comment

                  • gr8slayer
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 20796

                    #10
                    Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                    Originally posted by clumping platelets
                    The original premise is not true..........Bills can reaquire their 5th rd pick OR a higher pick in the 5th rd and then tender Scott as a RFA
                    Reaquire via trade?

                    Comment

                    • Dr. Lecter
                      Zero for Zero!
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 67946

                      #11
                      Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                      You don't draft (solely) for need.

                      They are also talking about moving McCargo to the other DT spot (young guy, bulk him up).

                      You also have the fact that the drop-off was huge to the next DT.
                      Originally posted by mysticsoto
                      Lecter is right in everything he said.

                      Comment

                      • Dr. Lecter
                        Zero for Zero!
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 67946

                        #12
                        Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                        Originally posted by clumping platelets
                        The original premise is not true..........Bills can reaquire their 5th rd pick OR a higher pick in the 5th rd and then tender Scott as a RFA
                        True. I think that is assumed and his point was at this time they can't go after the guy.

                        Semantics and technicalities.
                        Originally posted by mysticsoto
                        Lecter is right in everything he said.

                        Comment

                        • clumping platelets

                          #13
                          Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                          Originally posted by gr8slayer
                          Reaquire via trade?

                          yes........but they must do it before they tender an offer sheet

                          Comment

                          • Dr. Lecter
                            Zero for Zero!
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 67946

                            #14
                            Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                            Originally posted by clumping platelets
                            yes........but they must do it before they tender an offer sheet
                            Clump to the Rams for a 5th round pick!
                            Originally posted by mysticsoto
                            Lecter is right in everything he said.

                            Comment

                            • HHURRICANE
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 15490

                              #15
                              Re: Bills unable to go after Jake Scott???

                              Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                              You don't draft (solely) for need.

                              They are also talking about moving McCargo to the other DT spot (young guy, bulk him up).

                              You also have the fact that the drop-off was huge to the next DT.
                              Look I'm very happry with Marv and what he has done. I liked the Jauron hiring on day 1. But Pat is 100% correct. We had/have glaring holes i.e. the Offensive Line, and you go back into the first to get the exact same player that you just picked up in FA. Sorry that doesn't fly. We don't have the luxury of drafting for depth in Round 1.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X