according to ESPN the raiders want him to restructure if he doesn't he could be cut
Lamont Jordan
Collapse
X
-
Re: Lamont Jordan
i would love to have jordan here.. he is a guy that plays with a lot of heart and passion. he was one of the only players on the raiders last season that played is guts out and actually cared that they were losing."All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
-
-
Re: Lamont Jordan
here is the link it's at the bottom of the page http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/column...ohn&id=2787051 the Raiders want him to redo his bonus but he doesn't want tolets go BUFFALO lets go BUFFALO
Comment
-
-
Re: Lamont Jordan
I would take Jordan in a heartbeat as a replacement for McGahee. Jordan may be pretty similar to McGahee running the ball, but is a far superior pass receiver. With Jordan, JP Losman would have a RB to drop the ball off to that opposing defenses would have to respect on every passing play.
The only problem that I have with Jordan is that he probably won't come cheap and he probably won't be happy if the Bills draft a good RB this year or next who will take touches away from him (personally, I would prefer to see the Bills wait until next year's draft to take a RB, but it's looking more and more like they are going to have to draft one this season now).
While this started out being a rather thin free agent market at the RB position, with Henry, Dillon and now perhaps Jordan being cut loose, the price for a free agent RB may drop some--which would be good for the Bills in terms of signing a # 2 RB or someone to replace McGahee. But, that could make it harder for the Bills to be able to get anything decent, in terms of a draft pick, in return for McGahee.
A best case scenario for the Bills would seem to be that they deal McGahee rather quickly and, then, have Oakland cut Jordan afterwards. I don't know if they will be able to pull that off, though.
It should be interesting to see what happens.Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. And, thus it was that they surrendered their freedom; not with a bang, but without even a whimper.
Comment
-
Comment