Suppose we got Takeo and Adams. Then we could still afford Hugh. Would you get him?
Suppose we could still afford Hugh Douglas
Collapse
X
-
I wouldn't even want Hugh Douglass. I'd reather spend the money elsewhere, like on a saftey or a WR or even a kick returner who could return kicks unlike Rogers. But also heres a good article on another reason why i wouldn't take Douglass......
Impossible is Nothing.
Comment
-
-
i would take douglas in a heartbeat.. are you kidding.. he is the most consistent and best DE in the league, besides maybe a jason taylor.
and we have not signed anyone to backloaded contracts... so that is not an issue."All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tatonka
i would take douglas in a heartbeat.. are you kidding.. he is the most consistent and best DE in the league, besides maybe a jason taylor.
and we have not signed anyone to backloaded contracts... so that is not an issue.
I wouldn't touch a 31 year old DE who gets worse and worse as the season goes. From this point of his career he will get worse and worse each season, why do you think Philly doesn't want to pay him all the money hes asking for? They can afford it they just know hes not the same player as everyone seems he is.
Besides, i doubt we'd win him in a bidding war with Kansas City.Impossible is Nothing.
Comment
-
Comment