Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

    I think this move is highly likely.

    Heres the link:

    The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.


    Its a bit goofy that he says its too early for us to take Patrick Willis and then has a team taking him 2 picks later, also he has Leon Hall drafted right after us.

    Regardless, having those 3 available at our pick should make the front office very very happily undecided.

    The only downside is Okoye going before our slot.

    My dream 1st round would be one of the following assuming no other FA pickups:

    Lynch, Hall, Okoye, Willis

    I think were poised to get one hell of a prospect, its exciting to be a Bills fan.

  • Elminster
    #1 Kelsay Fan
    • Oct 2006
    • 928

    #2
    Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

    I doubt it, especially if we resign A-Train. With him, we'd just need a RB to split time(initially) and not carry the load i.e. we wouldn't have to spend our first for Marshawn Lynch and could get a rawer prospect in the 2nd...
    Good riddance Fairchild. Of course, the knowledge of your departure will only make TE more hateable than the typical Bills QB. Good luck, hope we don't mess you up like JP.

    Comment

    • jpdex12
      Registered User
      • Jan 2005
      • 2670

      #3
      Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

      Originally posted by Elminster
      I doubt it, especially if we resign A-Train. With him, we'd just need a RB to split time(initially) and not carry the load i.e. we wouldn't have to spend our first for Marshawn Lynch and could get a rawer prospect in the 2nd...
      Let's just say that any one fo them would help our team significantly.
      Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

      Comment

      • SquishDaFish
        Lets GO BUFFALO!!
        • Jun 2005
        • 17034

        #4
        Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

        Id be happy with any of them. Personally I hope we fill our CB need in FA somehow so we can lean towards one of the other 3 or Okoye if he is there.

        Comment

        • Mahdi
          Registered User
          • Mar 2004
          • 10585

          #5
          Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

          Originally posted by Elminster
          I doubt it, especially if we resign A-Train. With him, we'd just need a RB to split time(initially) and not carry the load i.e. we wouldn't have to spend our first for Marshawn Lynch and could get a rawer prospect in the 2nd...
          This offense is not designed to just have any Rbs splitting time in the backfield.... Levy wants his #1 back who can do it all and thats what Fairchild is used to having... ie Faulk and Jackson. This offense needs that type of RB and now that we have the OL Lynch is the missing piece. And now that both the Browns and the Lions have filled their voids at RB, its very likely to see both Peterson and Lynch fall to us. In that case I would still take Lynch.

          Comment

          • YardRat
            Well, lookie here...
            • Dec 2004
            • 86320

            #6
            Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

            Who did Kirwan have us picking last year?
            YardRat Wall of Fame
            #56 DARRYL TALLEY
            #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

            Comment

            • SABURZFAN
              short bus extraordinaire
              • Jul 2002
              • 50747

              #7
              Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

              i'm not sold on lynch being the #12 pick in the draft.there are other RB's we could consider later in the draft.
              Originally posted by yordad
              Christ, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.

              Comment

              • Pinkerton Security
                Pinkerton's son
                • Feb 2006
                • 6003

                #8
                Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

                Originally posted by Elminster
                I doubt it, especially if we resign A-Train. With him, we'd just need a RB to split time(initially) and not carry the load i.e. we wouldn't have to spend our first for Marshawn Lynch and could get a rawer prospect in the 2nd...
                ...such as Pittman from Ohio state? That'd be pretty nasty IMO, either Hall, Okoye or Willis in Rd. 1 and then Pittman rd. 2!!



                GO BILLS!!



                how come the draft seems so far away...

                Comment

                • jpdex12
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 2670

                  #9
                  Re: Pat Kirwan has us taking M Lynch!

                  Originally posted by Mahdi
                  This offense is not designed to just have any Rbs splitting time in the backfield.... Levy wants his #1 back who can do it all and thats what Fairchild is used to having... ie Faulk and Jackson. This offense needs that type of RB and now that we have the OL Lynch is the missing piece. And now that both the Browns and the Lions have filled their voids at RB, its very likely to see both Peterson and Lynch fall to us. In that case I would still take Lynch.
                  Who did the Browns pick up? I'm hearing that the Lions had Tatum Bell up for a trade already. Don't know why. Anyone hear this?
                  Where else would you rather be than right here right now?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X