Rams sign McMichael

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Philagape
    WIN NOW
    • Jul 2002
    • 19432

    Rams sign McMichael

    Rams | McMichael signs
    Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:26:00 -0800

    StLouisRams.com reports the St. Louis Rams have signed unrestricted free-agent TE Randy McMichael (Dolphins) to a three-year deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.
    "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

    "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

    2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
    2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
  • mysticsoto
    Too sober for this...
    • Apr 2004
    • 31439

    #2
    Re: Rams sign McMichael

    Originally posted by Philagape
    Rams | McMichael signs
    Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:26:00 -0800

    StLouisRams.com reports the St. Louis Rams have signed unrestricted free-agent TE Randy McMichael (Dolphins) to a three-year deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.

    From rotoworld:

    Rams agreed to terms with TE Randy McMichael on a three-year contract. The deal is worth $3 million-per-year, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
    A shocker here after St. Louis used two first-day picks on tight ends in 2006. However coach Scott Linehan knows McMike from Miami in 2005, when he caught 60 passes, five for TDs, and McMichael is still young at 27. This kills Joe Klopfenstein's keeper value and makes Dominique Byrd's release likely. The Rams will address their run defense issues in the draft.


    Comment

    • Lexwhat
      Registered User
      • Feb 2005
      • 2926

      #3
      Re: Rams sign McMichael

      Wow, thats a pretty good deal, financially, for the Rams ... We paid $2.5 million a year for the scrub Robert Royal. McMicheal is 10x better than Royal...

      Not that I want McMicheal on my team though...no wife beaters please.

      Comment

      • !Papacrunk!
        Registered User
        • Mar 2004
        • 2786

        #4
        Re: Rams sign McMichael

        in an article Linehan mentioned how this deal had been in the works and thought about a trade---too bad that part didn't happen. On the field I enjoyed his intensity, and his blocking actually was getting a lot better then it had been. He needs to work on his dropsies, but I'm glad he went there as opposed to the Jets, who was one of the teams rumored to have been interested.

        Comment

        • dolphan117
          Registered User
          • Dec 2005
          • 1999

          #5
          Re: Rams sign McMichael

          Given that we couldnt get a pick for him and that now he signs a cheap contract like that I really wonder if he didnt have 2 strikes against him in the NFL substance abuse program. With the money that his been getting thrown around that is a cheap, cheap deal.

          Comment

          • !Papacrunk!
            Registered User
            • Mar 2004
            • 2786

            #6
            Re: Rams sign McMichael

            Originally posted by dolphan117
            Given that we couldnt get a pick for him and that now he signs a cheap contract like that I really wonder if he didnt have 2 strikes against him in the NFL substance abuse program. With the money that his been getting thrown around that is a cheap, cheap deal.
            when did he have one strike?

            Comment

            • LtFinFan66
              Registered User
              • Mar 2005
              • 47199

              #7
              Re: Rams sign McMichael

              Good question

              Comment

              • dolphan117
                Registered User
                • Dec 2005
                • 1999

                #8
                Re: Rams sign McMichael

                Originally posted by !Papacrunk!
                when did he have one strike?
                As far as we know he never had any strikes...... But he way the system works is that the league isn't allowed to say anything about anything until the third strike which results in a suspension. Until then its a private issue between the player, the league, and the team. It just lands the player in rehab.

                However other teams that are interested in a player and are doing their due diligence in researching a guys history prior to a trade or a FA signing are informed by the league what the status of the guy is concerning any positive tests.... They aren't supposed to tell anyone of course but sometimes it leaks.

                That's how it came out last year that Ricky was going to be suspended. The Broncos were doing their research to make up their mind on whether or not to make a play for him and the league informed them that he was facing a one year suspension. That info then leaked out of Denver.

                Comment

                • HHURRICANE
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 15490

                  #9
                  Re: Rams sign McMichael

                  Originally posted by LtFinFan66
                  Good question
                  This post is funny because ESPN had him resigning with the Dolphins before I left for dinner. I was like "that makes sense".

                  I'm going there right now to see if it's still there.

                  Comment

                  • HHURRICANE
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 15490

                    #10
                    Re: Rams sign McMichael

                    Originally posted by HHURRICANE
                    This post is funny because ESPN had him resigning with the Dolphins before I left for dinner. I was like "that makes sense".

                    I'm going there right now to see if it's still there.
                    Sorry to ESPN. It was on the "official" NFL website.

                    The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X