PDA

View Full Version : DT Adam Carriker



RedEyE
03-08-2007, 07:22 PM
Did anyone else read this? 4.7 40 at 291 LBs?!!!! That's just crazy. These guys get bigger and faster every year.

<TABLE style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #002d78 1px solid" width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=left>Today
</TD><TD align=right>Posted By: Chris Brown | Time: 9:21 AM
</SPAN>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
CARRIKER IS A FREAK: Nebraska defensive lineman Adam Carriker is officially a freak of nature. He had his pro day yesterday along with all the other Cornhuskers coming out. He's 6'6" and weighed in a 291 pounds. He ran a 4.72 and a 4.73 40 time... at 291 pounds!!! By contrast Nebraska LB Stewart Bradley ran a 4.75 and 4.76 at 258 pounds. I was talking to Kelsay about his fellow Cornhusker (Carriker) when he was in town to sign his new deal. Kelsay said,

GhostofVanPelt
03-08-2007, 07:25 PM
Ya, but everyone runs a lot faster on their pro day.. Don't get too excited

Nighthawk
03-08-2007, 07:35 PM
Don't want him...we already have guys that play like him...their names are Schobel & Kelsey.

the dude
03-08-2007, 07:39 PM
especially at the Nebraska track - their RB ran about .15 seconds faster than he did at the combine.

Grain of salt, meet Bills fan.

j/k

BillsNick
03-08-2007, 07:58 PM
A DT that weighs 291 seems pretty small to me.

Slim
03-08-2007, 08:14 PM
Didnt he play DE at Nebraska?

OpIv37
03-08-2007, 09:13 PM
I don't want any DT that doesn't weigh 3 bills.

DraftBoy
03-08-2007, 09:23 PM
You guys are missing the point, this kid was a dominant pass rusher at Nebraska playing DE and has openly admitted he'd be open to moving to DT and bulking up. He has crazy athleticism, he is not Schoebel or Kelsay.

OpIv37
03-08-2007, 09:25 PM
You guys are missing the point, this kid was a dominant pass rusher at Nebraska playing DE and has openly admitted he'd be open to moving to DT and bulking up. He has crazy athleticism, he is not Schoebel or Kelsay.

interesting but our DL is hurting BAD- we need a proven commodity, not someone who needs to bulk up and change positions.

The Spaz
03-08-2007, 09:29 PM
Okoye FTW!:lol:

Devin
03-08-2007, 09:37 PM
You guys are missing the point, this kid was a dominant pass rusher at Nebraska playing DE and has openly admitted he'd be open to moving to DT and bulking up. He has crazy athleticism, he is not Schoebel or Kelsay.

Oi you keep facts out of this argument.

Carriker having probably the best technique of any DE in the draft, or being one of the strongest/most versatile.....etc has nothing to do with this. He runs really fast!

TigerJ
03-08-2007, 10:14 PM
Yeah, I posted it in the Scouting Zone earlier.

feelthepain
03-09-2007, 01:59 AM
I think he would be an awsome selection for the Bills and a guy I don't want in the division unless he's a fin!!

DraftBoy
03-09-2007, 06:38 AM
interesting but our DL is hurting BAD- we need a proven commodity, not someone who needs to bulk up and change positions.


Technically at 291 he has no need to bulk up and he'd already come in as one of the strongest dlineman on our team. As for changing posistions Im not that concerned, bc even if we take a player like Okoye, it will take him atleast a year to adjust to the NFL game being only 19, and with Branch he has to learn a whole new system. Im not too worried about Carriker needing to switch, I just like that on passing downs he can roll outside and it also makes for a dominant stunt with the DE and DT.

DraftBoy
03-09-2007, 06:38 AM
Oi you keep facts out of this argument.

Carriker having probably the best technique of any DE in the draft, or being one of the strongest/most versatile.....etc has nothing to do with this. He runs really fast!

Damnit I did it again my bad... :nerd:

LtFinFan66
03-09-2007, 06:41 AM
I don't want any DT that doesn't weigh 3 bills.One good buffet line and he would be at 3 bills

don137
03-09-2007, 07:00 AM
I am no expert or guru but I would think quickness is better than being fast for a DT. I would think the ability to adjust and being quick to run 10 yards to attack a player is better than a fast 40 time since if you are in the open field you still won't catch a RB or WR. IF you are fast you might be able to close the whole quicker or get to the player while he is dancing back there.

DraftBoy
03-09-2007, 07:11 AM
I am no expert or guru but I would think quickness is better than being fast for a DT. I would think the ability to adjust and being quick to run 10 yards to attack a player is better than a fast 40 time since if you are in the open field you still won't catch a RB or WR. IF you are fast you might be able to close the whole quicker or get to the player while he is dancing back there.

I am glad you mentioned that;


Not athletic? His 4.7 at his pro day puts him 4th among fastest DEs, He had the most bench reps with 33, 5th highest vertical jump, middle of the pack broad jump, the fastest shuttle time, and the 2nd fastest cone drill...the kids drips athleticism.

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/nflcombinebypos.php?draftyear=2007&GenPos=DE&sortorder=cone&order=ASC

(thanks to TigerJ for the link, which is stickied in this forum)


this was in response to a thread in the Scouting Zone. Quickness is measured by two drills Shuttle and Cone as you can see Carriker is arguable the "quickest" DE in the draft.

OpIv37
03-09-2007, 08:24 AM
Technically at 291 he has no need to bulk up

I disagree. We have a bunch of 290-295 guys on the DL and they get pushed all over the field.

DraftBoy
03-09-2007, 08:27 AM
I disagree. We have a bunch of 290-295 guys on the DL and they get pushed all over the field.


Well thats why I said (and its the part of the quote you cut off) he would probably come in as our strongest lineman, which would say that he would not be so easily pushed off the line.

Saratoga Slim
03-09-2007, 08:42 AM
strength can compensate for lack of weight. an exceptionally strong 290 pounder is every bit as immovable as an average 310 pounder.