1)Well he has played in limited action- 31 of the starting running backs in the league would be behind L.T. Maybe some of the traits that we praise L.T. for like his maturity, and his leadership would rub off on this kid. How about receiving a back from a wining program like the chargers?
2)He has never carried a full time load for a NFL team- People actually look at this as a weakness? Turner has less ware and tear on him then most of the running backs comming into this draft. A running back has a short shelve life, the less work they receive the better. Do we know for sure if Peterson, or Lynch can shoulder the load for a NFL team? No, but Peterson has shown he gets hurt alot. Turner has far more expierence then any rookie, and he has less ware then any "veteran" runners. Veteran runners that we a clamouring for that have failed to keep their old jobs.
3)The charger's o-line is better then the bills- I will not argue that point, but i will say the bills have made strides this offseason. What running back runs well behind a crappy offensive line. Ask the Edge, or any denver running back the importance of a offensive line.
4) He doesn't have the speed - Turners a power runner but he has elusiveness to be a number 1 back. He was a kick returner and a damn good one. He can take it to the house and he's shown that in San Diego. He had longer runs and Yard per rush far great then McGahee has ever came close to as a Bill.
Turner i would argue is as good or better then any running back in the draft. He's 24 which is still very young for a 4 year NFL vet. I would love to see him in a bills uni, and for all those argue that he could be like Rob Johnson please move on. I argue that any running back taken in the draft could be like Willis Mcgahee, or Chris Brown. Turner does have risks, but they are no greater then any back you draft, or of any vet who couldn't keep their job and were cut loose by another team(s)
2)He has never carried a full time load for a NFL team- People actually look at this as a weakness? Turner has less ware and tear on him then most of the running backs comming into this draft. A running back has a short shelve life, the less work they receive the better. Do we know for sure if Peterson, or Lynch can shoulder the load for a NFL team? No, but Peterson has shown he gets hurt alot. Turner has far more expierence then any rookie, and he has less ware then any "veteran" runners. Veteran runners that we a clamouring for that have failed to keep their old jobs.
3)The charger's o-line is better then the bills- I will not argue that point, but i will say the bills have made strides this offseason. What running back runs well behind a crappy offensive line. Ask the Edge, or any denver running back the importance of a offensive line.
4) He doesn't have the speed - Turners a power runner but he has elusiveness to be a number 1 back. He was a kick returner and a damn good one. He can take it to the house and he's shown that in San Diego. He had longer runs and Yard per rush far great then McGahee has ever came close to as a Bill.
G | GS | Att | Yds | Avg | Lg | TD | 20+ | 1st |
2004 | San Diego Chargers | 14 | 1 | 20 | 104 | 5.2 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 4 | ||
2005 | San Diego Chargers | 16 | 0 | 57 | 335 | 5.9 | 83 | 3 | 1 | 11 | ||
2006 | San Diego Chargers | 13 | 0 | 80 | 502 | 6.3 | 73 | 2 | 7 | 24 | ||
TOTAL | 43 | 1 | 157 | 941 | 6.0 | 83 | 5 | 10 | 39 | |||
![]() |
Receiving | ||||||||||||
Year | Team | G | GS | Rec | Yds | Avg | Lg | TD | 20+ | 40+ | 1st | |
2004 | San Diego Chargers | 14 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 2.0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
2005 | San Diego Chargers | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
2006 | San Diego Chargers | 13 | 0 | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
TOTAL | 43 | 1 | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Comment