Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Collapse
X
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
I guess I forgot to bring this up in the 100 other Mcgahee threads, but I wondered why JP Losman was always given the benefit of the doubt---"his play hasn't been as good as it could be, because of the bad o-line" and not McGahee? I would imagine McGahee was also a victim of the suspect line, wouldn't you say?
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Originally posted by !Papacrunk!I guess I forgot to bring this up in the 100 other Mcgahee threads, but I wondered why JP Losman was always given the benefit of the doubt---"his play hasn't been as good as it could be, because of the bad o-line" and not McGahee? I would imagine McGahee was also a victim of the suspect line, wouldn't you say?
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Crowell > Fletcher.
Wait all this cant be true hasnt Ice Jr. been stating the sky is falling for weeks now?
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
I haven't heard of Anthony Bialy but the dude is an awesome writer.
I love this line.
Clements showed that he could be an exciting player, but his high-risk, high-return play often led to exciting moments for opponents, too. He calls himself "The Playmaker," despite two facts: A) no one should ever be allowed to bestow his own nickname on himself, ever, and B) especially not one as obnoxiously arrogant as "The Playmaker," the sort of moniker that would make Deion Sanders blush.
I don't know if I'd say we're better without Clements, Fletcher, and McGahee - but he makes good points about why the blow won't be as significant as one might assume.Disclaimer: The sentiment expressed in this post is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Originally posted by JoeMamaI haven't heard of Anthony Bialy but the dude is an awesome writer.
I love this line.
LOL!
I don't know if I'd say we're better without Clements, Fletcher, and McGahee - but he makes good points about why the blow won't be as significant as one might assume.
I've used this one too many times and I know it's a stolen quote but:
"We lost with you so we can afford to lose without you"Last edited by HHURRICANE; 03-20-2007, 08:35 AM.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Originally posted by patmoran2006Me neither.. Its FLtecher that hurts.. Some people on here dont know how good he was until they see his replacement.
-
👍 3
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Originally posted by !Papacrunk!I guess I forgot to bring this up in the 100 other Mcgahee threads, but I wondered why JP Losman was always given the benefit of the doubt---"his play hasn't been as good as it could be, because of the bad o-line" and not McGahee? I would imagine McGahee was also a victim of the suspect line, wouldn't you say?
It's probably the same reason why he just didn't learn the playbook and had an extra coach signaling plays to him in the huddle. It's probably the same reason he practically always missed his blocking assignments not because of getting beat on the field but because he just didn't know who he was supposed to block.
The Ravens line might not be as bad as ours last year but they still are pretty bad. Unless the coaching staff dummies down everything for McGahee and get him to quit the dancing, they are in for a long season.Last edited by madness; 03-20-2007, 08:59 AM.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Bills' losses make them better by subtraction
Originally posted by HHURRICANEI've used this one to many times and I know it's a stolen quote but:
"We lost with you so we can afford to lose without you"Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
-
👍 2
Comment
-
Comment