If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Because Lynch is a 1st round talent. Why wouldn't we not trade our 1st for Turner if he is better than Lynch... if we were going to draft Lynch with the 12th pick in draft. Just saying if we were set with Lynch at 12, i'd rather get TURNER aboard as i feel he is a more COMPLETE BACK.
It's basically down to this for the Packers: Work out a trade for Randy Moss, Michael Turner or Darrell Jackson or forget about adding a veteran on offense who can make a major impact next season.
Because Lynch is a 1st round talent. Why wouldn't we not trade our 1st for Turner if he is better than Lynch... if we were going to draft Lynch with the 12th pick in draft. Just saying if we were set with Lynch at 12, i'd rather get TURNER aboard as i feel he is a more COMPLETE BACK.
Stamps while turner has more Exp he is not a good receiver. How is a more complete back than Lynch who is very good out of the backfield?
Because Lynch is a 1st round talent. Why wouldn't we not trade our 1st for Turner if he is better than Lynch... if we were going to draft Lynch with the 12th pick in draft. Just saying if we were set with Lynch at 12, i'd rather get TURNER aboard as i feel he is a more COMPLETE BACK.
At this point you would have to say Turner because he's a proven NFL back, albeit in a back up capacity.
As for Lynch - for all we know he could be the next LT or the next KiJana Carter.
Tweet
Comment