Something smells fishy

[patmoran2006]

Find it odd Buffalo has all this money, made a couple of financial roster dumps (and to credit got value still in return) and havent even brought in the typical jabroni backup FA's that they usually do?

Maybe, its because they been saving their pennies for Briggs and/or Turner.. That's a good thing.

Either that, or they are just that ****ing cheap.

[BILLSROCK1212]

Re: Something smells fishy

Find it odd Buffalo has all this money, made a couple of financial roster dumps (and to credit got value still in return) and havent even brought in the typical jabroni backup FA's that they usually do?

Maybe, its because they been saving their pennies for Briggs and/or Turner.. That's a good thing.

Either that, or they are just that ****ing cheap.

hopefully they have been saving their money for Turner and Briggs

[patmoran2006]

Re: Something smells fishy

That would be sickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Instant legit divisional contenders with them two..

Plus they'd still have a pair of third rounders for more good depth.

[jamesiscool]

Re: Something smells fishy

if we do bring em in then now we have the answers to all of the questions we were asking just a few days ago about ralphs cheapness.

[BILLSROCK1212]

Re: Something smells fishy

That would be sickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Instant legit divisional contenders with them two..

Plus they'd still have a pair of third rounders for more good depth.

add a reciever in the draft along with a CB and i guess a TE and I can't really think of a better team that we could possibly have

[jamesiscool]

Re: Something smells fishy

add a reciever in the draft along with a CB and i guess a TE and I can't really think of a better team that we could possibly have

if we had peyton manning LT and randy moss we could possibly have a better team....

[BILLSROCK1212]

Re: Something smells fishy

if we had peyton manning LT and randy moss we could possibly have a better team....

of course but realistically....

[patmoran2006]

Re: Something smells fishy

I think Marv is smart enough to know our LB corp as a whole is rotten, he's smart enough to assume Willis will be gone; and that NOBODY else out there is going to do much if anything to help this team improve in 2007 (at LB)

Thats why I think this Briggs talk is just not talk; I think its legit.. and I think the Bears would take our deal first as they'd havea pair of 1st rounders..

As usual though, the REAL question is; WILL WILSON pay for Briggs. (I hope so)

[jamesiscool]

Re: Something smells fishy

just playing the antagonizer.... as usual.

[YardRat]

Re: Something smells fishy

Find it odd Buffalo has all this money, made a couple of financial roster dumps (and to credit got value still in return) and havent even brought in the typical jabroni backup FA's that they usually do?

Maybe, its because they been saving their pennies for Briggs and/or Turner.. That's a good thing.

Either that, or they are just that ****ing cheap.

I don't find it odd since Marv clearly stated in one of his PC's that they were taking a different approach this off-season and concentrating on quality over quantity.

[JJamezz]

Re: Something smells fishy

Somebody made a really good point in another thread, it might have been you Pat - about the new revenue sharing agreement.. I think its entirely possible that that has loosened up Ralph's purse strings a bit.

The thought has also crossed my mind about Briggs and Washington - my guess is most owners around the league are not big fans of Dan Schneider and what his spending has done to the league. Certainly the compensation is foremost, but it makes me wonder if dislike for Schneider might at all play into Angelo and where he'd be willing to send Briggs...

[HHURRICANE]

Re: Something smells fishy

Somebody made a really good point in another thread, it might have been you Pat - about the new revenue sharing agreement.. I think its entirely possible that that has loosened up Ralph's purse strings a bit.

The thought has also crossed my mind about Briggs and Washington - my guess is most owners around the league are not big fans of Dan Schneider and what his spending has done to the league. Certainly the compensation is foremost, but it makes me wonder if dislike for Schneider might at all play into Angelo and where he'd be willing to send Briggs...

Better to send a player to a team that isn't in your conference!!

[BILLSROCK1212]

Re: Something smells fishy

Better to send a player to a team that isn't in your conference!!

that is the best part about the Briggs trade and the worst part about the Turner trade

[Bert102176]

Re: Something smells fishy

to hell with Briggs and Turner

[!Papacrunk!]

Re: Something smells fishy

That would be sickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Instant legit divisional contenders with them two..

Plus they'd still have a pair of third rounders for more good depth.

didn't Phin fans in the past get bashed for saying these same type of things when they would add free agents in the past, lol