Whatever doesnt require us moving out of 12.
Im for....
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
👍 1
-
-
Re: Im for....
What about parting with #12 for Briggs?
are you for that?www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire
-
-
Re: Im for....
No I am not. Urlachers sidekick wont have urlacher here.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by DevinWhatever doesnt require us moving out of 12.
If we keep the 12 pick:
1. There is no guarantee Willis will be available.
2. There is no guarantee Marv will pick him if he's available
3. There is no guarantee he won't be a bust
4. There is no guarantee that he'll be ready to step in and play well immediately- even if he turns out to be great it may take him a year or two to get there.
If we trade the 12 for Briggs, we would have used it to fill our biggest hole with a proven NFL player rather than risking it on a draft pick who may or may not be there and who may or may not be good.
I understand that playing next to Urlacher helped Briggs, but he's still an improvement over anything we have and he's got NFL experience that any draft pick lacks. And he's only 26 so he has some solid years left- he won't just be a 2 year stopgap.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by OpIv37Our biggest hole is LB.
If we keep the 12 pick:
1. There is no guarantee Willis will be available.
2. There is no guarantee Marv will pick him if he's available
3. There is no guarantee he won't be a bust
4. There is no guarantee that he'll be ready to step in and play well immediately- even if he turns out to be great it may take him a year or two to get there.
If we trade the 12 for Briggs, we would have used it to fill our biggest hole with a proven NFL player rather than risking it on a draft pick who may or may not be there and who may or may not be good.
I understand that playing next to Urlacher helped Briggs, but he's still an improvement over anything we have and he's got NFL experience that any draft pick lacks. And he's only 26 so he has some solid years left- he won't just be a 2 year stopgap.
Neither of which he has here.
I like the guy, but given what he will cost and what his contract demands maybe (did anyone read the Skins offer?) ill pass.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by OpIv37Our biggest hole is LB.
If we keep the 12 pick:
1. There is no guarantee Willis will be available.
2. There is no guarantee Marv will pick him if he's available
3. There is no guarantee he won't be a bust
4. There is no guarantee that he'll be ready to step in and play well immediately- even if he turns out to be great it may take him a year or two to get there.
If we trade the 12 for Briggs, we would have used it to fill our biggest hole with a proven NFL player rather than risking it on a draft pick who may or may not be there and who may or may not be good.
I understand that playing next to Urlacher helped Briggs, but he's still an improvement over anything we have and he's got NFL experience that any draft pick lacks. And he's only 26 so he has some solid years left- he won't just be a 2 year stopgap.
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by DevinWhatever doesnt require us moving out of 12.
we could move up or down in the draft.we have enough draft picks to make a play to move up or we could move down and get another pick.you can never have too many Day 1 draft picks.Originally posted by yordadChrist, you are the queerest person in the history of Bills fanhood. I swear to god I would stomp you.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by SABURZFANwe could move up or down in the draft.we have enough draft picks to make a play to move up or we could move down and get another pick.you can never have too many Day 1 draft picks.
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
If Willis isn't there, I don't want to draft 12th"It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
I'm for winning more football games and not foolishly imagining every college player mentioned as a 1st, 2nd rounder is a " stud "... even though more than half never make an impact in the NFL.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Im for....
Originally posted by Night TrainI'm for winning more football games and not foolishly imagining every college player mentioned as a 1st, 2nd rounder is a " stud "... even though more than half never make an impact in the NFL.
Comment
-
Comment