Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

    Yes, we have other needs like LB and could easily make a big impact with a LB at 12.

    But how high do you rank Peterson? We have a need at RB as well, is Peterson worth moving up to say 6 for?

    How good is he?

    If hes the player some think he his, he could change our game, give us the running game were desperate for at this point.

    I honestly feel theres a huge drop off after Lynch and Peterson.

    So, if you love Peterson, is he worth moving up for?

  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86311

    #2
    Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

    No. I stay put.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

    Comment

    • Devin
      The Octagon
      • Apr 2003
      • 23878

      #3
      Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

      Thats a tough call, realistically your talking about swapping 1sts and giving up a 2nd at least.

      Id probably do it but id do so knowing we will likely have coy wire as a starting LB.
      http://gridironjunkies.net/forums/index.php

      Comment

      • Ebenezer
        Give me a minute...
        • Jul 2002
        • 73867

        #4
        Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

        no...too expensive for a RB.




        For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.

        Comment

        • jamze132
          Don’t hate…
          • Jun 2003
          • 29410

          #5
          Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

          Man, how many times has this question been asked in the past month?

          NO. It would be a mistake to trade up to get him. It's much harder to find a great LB than a great RB.

          Comment

          • Scumbag College
            Registered User
            • Oct 2002
            • 4949

            #6
            Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

            Too many holes to fill on this team to move up at all. Players will be there with their four picks in rounds 2-4 that can help this team immediately.
            Remember Kevin Everett in your thoughts.

            Vote Nader in 2008!

            http://www.votenader.org/

            Comment

            • don137
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 7720

              #7
              Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

              The Bills need as many day one picks as possible. If anything trade down for an extra 2nd or 3rd depending on how far they go.

              Comment

              • TigerJ
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 22575

                #8
                Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                If Peterson is gone, I have no problem drafting Willis. If Willis is gone too, I probably would draft Lynch. I think the chances Lynch is gone are slim. If he is gone too, I try to trade down. If I can't trade down I pick Leon Hall. I won't like it, but I still don't want to trade up.
                I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                Comment

                • acattack15
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 87

                  #9
                  Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                  You gotta really look at trading Up, and Getting a future All-Pro RB, and then grabbing two LB in the 3rd, and maybe another on day 2. Think long and hard.

                  I really don't care though, for me, Patrick Willis is an amazing player, i want him too, soo i highly doubt we would trade up, i just fine with Willis at 12 and a 2nd tier Rb such as kenny irons in the 2nd.

                  It matters the price tag for moving up. Hard decision, but i would say no, due to the probably price tag.
                  With the 12th Pick in the 2007 NFL Draft the Buffalo Bills select: Marshawn Lynch RB California
                  -The future Pro Bowl RB of the NFL-


                  http://calbears.cstv.com/sports/marshawn/

                  Comment

                  • Illmatic15
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 516

                    #10
                    Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                    YES MOVE UP!!! to no.7 the most, hopefully he drops to minnesota. We can give up an extra 3rd round pick who cares...






                    Ashton Youbotys #1 fan! reppin Liberia
                    GET WELL SOON KEVIN EVERETT!




                    Comment

                    • Tatonka
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 21289

                      #11
                      Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                      the only way i would trade up for him is if it would only cost us the 3rd we got for willis.
                      "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

                      Comment

                      • clumping platelets

                        #12
                        Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                        Comment

                        • jamesiscool
                          suck it fool.
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 733

                          #13
                          Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                          simply put, no.

                          we have way too many holes to fill on both sides of the ball and theres noooooo way we move UP for him.
                          Sec 241 row 12 seat 23

                          Comment

                          • Tatonka
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 21289

                            #14
                            Re: Peterson likely wont fall to 12, would you move up?

                            there is no way though, that if we moved up and got him, that this board wouldnt go abosutely nuts..

                            it would be pretty cool to draft a stud like him.
                            "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X