PDA

View Full Version : Peterson Scenerios



MarvLevy
04-25-2007, 09:45 AM
Washington?
Minnesota?
What would we have to do?
Im starting to really like this guys attitude!

patmoran2006
04-25-2007, 09:53 AM
Realistically..

I think our first and second to Washington..


And I think he'd be worth it.

Pinkerton Security
04-25-2007, 10:07 AM
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.

Mitchy moo
04-25-2007, 10:08 AM
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.

I'd rather do that and keep the 2nd, nice.

patmoran2006
04-25-2007, 10:10 AM
idk about the value chart, but could we give our first and 2 thirds to washington? i dont know if this would ultimately be better than a first and a second, but i think there may be a possibility of snagging a good LB that has slipped into the second if we gave them 2 3rd rounders as opposed to a second.
chart value wise, it isn't.

The funny thing about this year's LB's though is that for a cover two defense, there are better LB for that fit in the 3rd round than second.

Guys like Rufus Alexander, Buster Davis and Earl Everett are 3rd round projections by most.

Pinkerton Security
04-25-2007, 10:17 AM
chart value wise, it isn't.

The funny thing about this year's LB's though is that for a cover two defense, there are better LB for that fit in the 3rd round than second.

Guys like Rufus Alexander, Buster Davis and Earl Everett are 3rd round projections by most.

true true, i guess there really arent that many guys that are projected to go in the 2nd that i would want, and strangely the guys you mentioned that are projected to go in the 3rd i would like to have. plus, we would have 2 picks in the 3rd, so we could get WR or CB.

MarvLevy
04-25-2007, 03:57 PM
i want this guy!

MarvLevy
04-25-2007, 03:58 PM
IMO he is the next LT...or closet thing to him..

X-Era
04-25-2007, 06:19 PM
Realistically..

I think our first and second to Washington..


And I think he'd be worth it.

No, a 1st, a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next year would also do it most likely.

MarvLevy
04-25-2007, 06:25 PM
they'd want #2

X-Era
04-25-2007, 06:29 PM
they'd want #2

Im not so sure. The other teams in the mix have much lower picks, that 12 pick may make up for the 2nd in their minds.

mid to late 1st, and 2nd isnt as good as early 1st, early 3rd.

MarvLevy
04-25-2007, 06:31 PM
possible..cant wait!