If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
IMO.. (I think you meant they dont trade down, becuase if they could I would trade down for sure).
Marshawn Lynch-- unless they plan on landing Turner.
IF they are landing turner, then jon Beason-- easily.
Look, I like Reevis alot, a hell of a lot better than Hall.. Just refuse to believe we'd pick a CB with our first rounder.
we let nate walk in part because of the $ (obviously) but in part because a corner like him isnt quite as important in THIS PARTICULAR defense.. So we're just going to replace the CB in round one before the 2 LB's or the RB?
IMO.. (I think you meant they dont trade down, becuase if they could I would trade down for sure).
Marshawn Lynch-- unless they plan on landing Turner.
IF they are landing turner, then jon Beason-- easily.
Look, I like Reevis alot, a hell of a lot better than Hall.. Just refuse to believe we'd pick a CB with our first rounder.
we let nate walk in part because of the $ (obviously) but in part because a corner like him isnt quite as important in THIS PARTICULAR defense.. So we're just going to replace the CB in round one before the 2 LB's or the RB?
That makes ZERO SENSE.
Read the Thread Nancy. He said if NO ONE wants to trade up.
IMO.. (I think you meant they dont trade down, becuase if they could I would trade down for sure).
Marshawn Lynch-- unless they plan on landing Turner.
IF they are landing turner, then jon Beason-- easily.
Look, I like Reevis alot, a hell of a lot better than Hall.. Just refuse to believe we'd pick a CB with our first rounder.
we let nate walk in part because of the $ (obviously) but in part because a corner like him isnt quite as important in THIS PARTICULAR defense.. So we're just going to replace the CB in round one before the 2 LB's or the RB?
That makes ZERO SENSE.
I can see what you're saying. I would trade down first too, but, if we couldn't I would be fine with either Reevis or Beason. In this particular case I choose Reevis primarily because I feel that there are a good handful of value LB's we can pick up in rounds 2 and 3. Guys like Buster Davis or Justin Durant would be real solid 3rd round values. The one advantage we have at LB is that Crowell could play inside and outside. That leaves us more options.
We drafted Youboty last year and I hope he turns out to be a stud, but the reality is that he was a 3rd round pick, not a first rounder. As a third rounder I fully expect him to be a very good number 2 CB for a long time. Of course, I hope he has number 1 talent, but, again, he's a 3rd rounder. If he was a first rounder I would fully expect him to be a number 1 CB by his 2nd season.
Ideally, we trade down to 20-something and take Beason there.
I can see what you're saying. I would trade down first too, but, if we couldn't I would be fine with either Reevis or Beason. In this particular case I choose Reevis primarily because I feel that there are a good handful of value LB's we can pick up in rounds 2 and 3. Guys like Buster Davis or Justin Durant would be real solid 3rd round values. The one advantage we have at LB is that Crowell could play inside and outside. That leaves us more options.
We drafted Youboty last year and I hope he turns out to be a stud, but the reality is that he was a 3rd round pick, not a first rounder. As a third rounder I fully expect him to be a very good number 2 CB for a long time. Of course, I hope he has number 1 talent, but, again, he's a 3rd rounder. If he was a first rounder I would fully expect him to be a number 1 CB by his 2nd season.
Ideally, we trade down to 20-something and take Beason there.
Excellent points and I'd be lying if I said I disagreed with you about the value of decent cover two LB's in rounds 2-3. The guys you mentioned plus Earl Everett and Rufus Alexander are cover two system LB's (I think).
Under Lecter's scenario I'd absolutely TRADE DOWN for two reasons...
I understand you need a trade partner to do that. IF Denver dont trade with Houston they'd be the strongest possibility.. Especially if Anderson or Carriker are on the board. Another team nobody talks about is the New York Giants, who would LOVE to get their hands on Reevis.
Anyway, the two reasons I'd trade down to the 18-24 spots.
1- you can still get Beason or Pos anyway
2- We'd have two second rounders, which would then make trading for Turner a no-brainer.
Lynch or Reevis- Beason or Poz would be terrible value.
I disagree that Beason would be terrible value.. He's a cover two LB and he'll be gone within 4-5 picks after us if we didnt take him. he could be gone to Pitt at 15
haha! Nice try. Your thread got hijacked. Your terms aren't being met, negotiations are now going on and the trades are continuing. Maybe Pat will let some hostages go.
haha! Nice try. Your thread got hijacked. Your terms aren't being met, negotiations are now going on and the trades are continuing. Maybe Pat will let some hostages go.
you gonna start following my posts around again with your ignortant off-topic comments like usual?
Lecter posted a good question and I misread the trade part. Since then, I've answered the question ON TOPIC and related to the question.
Comment