Let the QB controversy begin.

[lordofgun]

[Pride]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

No controversy... this is a replacement for Nall, not for Losman!

[lordofgun]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

No controversy... this is a replacement for Nall, not for Losman!

You know there will be some fans who don't see it that way.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

I don't get why we picked a QB in the third. It makes no sense. Not only does it waste a pick we could have used on someone who could step right in it could also mess with JP's Confidence.

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

c ya JP..JP is not marvs boy.. he wants his own in there, u need a tall QB!!!!

jp will have nooooo confidence and will fold! seeeee ya!

[LtBillsFan66]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

If JP was better, there would be no controversy.

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

hughes would have been the smarter pick tho..lol pac-10 player of the year on D!!!! lol

[Michael82]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

You know there will be some fans who don't see it that way.

*cough* Tackling Dummy

*cough* SABURZ

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

hughes at cb would have bee the smarter pick tho...
pac-10 def player of the year! lol

[lightningbolt444]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

the only way there is a controversy is if losman doesnt perform and if thats the case then there shouldd be one guys be happy the bills are riding there hopes and dreams on one players sholders now. Think about it jp gets hurt our offense gets worse than it already was instantly now we have a solid smart backup.

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

hughes at cb would have bee the smarter pick tho...
pac-10 def player of the year! lol

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

i want this guy starting..period!!!!!!!!

[MarvLevy]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

i dont want JP to get hurt, but retire or go to the cfl or sooooomething!

[X-Era]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

It wont even get going, it will be squashed fast by the Bills FO.

This is a Schaub pick right here.

We need a security QB in case of injury, and in a few years we could trade him for alot if he gets some quality time due to injury.

[historypete]

Re: Let the QB controversy begin.

I see Trent Edwards being the Frank Reich to Jim Kelly. I think Nall is the back up next year, but then Edwards moves up the chart. The guys on ESPN actually liked the pick and said Edwards could be used for leverage in a few years like Schaub (a former 3rd rounder was). I think that is highly optimistic, but I see him as a solid backup.

This is not a reflection on JP, I think. JP is deservedly still the long-term QB of this team. The pick is Marv's way to get the team a solid back-up QB who can provide competition and insurance if JP goes down with an injury.