Power Rankings

[Bills232]

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/powerrankings

I don't see how the Cardinals are so high...

Didn't they have a top 5 draftpick?

[Mitchy moo]

Re: Power Rankings

ummm, we're going up that list.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Power Rankings

Four AFC teams at the top... wow. Maybe its a good thing we're not ready for a run this year! To be honest, that's about where I see us... in the 15-20 range. Our only goal this year should be a winning season. Anything more would be gravy. 9-7 this year would set us up nicely to make a move next year. Plus, it will give us one more year tos ee what areas we need to fine tune. Early underdog to win it all: the Saints.

[TheGhostofJimKelly]

Re: Power Rankings

Those rankings are always fun in May.

[BuffaloBillsStampede]

Re: Power Rankings

Well he got one thing right for sure when he said Vince Young played well, but not nearly as well as the hype.

[Pinkerton Security]

Re: Power Rankings

I cant believe the rams are ranked that high, as well as the cards, as someone mentioned. I am obviously biased as an afc fan, but the rams?? come on, their D is putrid. Steven Jackson is an animal, but their offense is aging and they cant stop anyone. I'd rank us ahead of them.

[gr8slayer]

Re: Power Rankings

I cant believe the rams are ranked that high, as well as the cards, as someone mentioned. I am obviously biased as an afc fan, but the rams?? come on, their D is putrid. Steven Jackson is an animal, but their offense is aging and they cant stop anyone. I'd rank us ahead of them.

Hey we have something in common with them.

[DaBillzAhDaShiznit]

Re: Power Rankings

There is no reason we are ranked that high. We should be ranked no higher than 25th at this point.

That said; who cares what rankings are in May? I would much rather be ranked low (justifiably so) and improve throughout the course of the pre-season and regular season than be ranked high and drop like a rock.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Power Rankings

fins are ranked too high.

[Pinkerton Security]

Re: Power Rankings

Hey we have something in common with them.

while our D is very suspect, id still take it over the rams.

Looking at their depth chart position by position, there is no way I would take any of their Defensive starters over any of ours, except perhaps Witherspoon.

http://www.stlouisrams.com/Team/DepthCharts/

even adding carriker in there, this Defense sucks. bad. even worse than ours!

[gr8slayer]

Re: Power Rankings

while our D is very suspect, id still take it over the rams.

Looking at their depth chart position by position, there is no way I would take any of their Defensive starters over any of ours, except perhaps Witherspoon.

http://www.stlouisrams.com/Team/DepthCharts/

even adding carriker in there, this Defense sucks. bad. even worse than ours!

I'd take Leonard Little, La'Roi Glover, Witherspoon, Tye Hill, Corey Chavous, and Pisa Tinoisamoa, and John Alston.

[Generalissimus Gibby]

Re: Power Rankings

northwesternfan don't you work the nightshift? Do they really let you have a laptop at the counter. Isn't your boss afraid someone will come in and steal stuff while you're distracted?

[Pinkerton Security]

Re: Power Rankings

I'd take Leonard Little, La'Roi Glover, Witherspoon, Tye Hill, Corey Chavous, and Pisa Tinoisamoa, and John Alston.

well i respect your opinion...

[ParanoidAndroid]

Re: Power Rankings

Every couple of years, the Cards look like they should be ready to move. They get some talent in the draft since they've been picking in the top 10 for the last decade. About every 2 or 3 years they get picked to win their division and then they drop 5 spots on the power rankings every Tuesday during the season. There's a problem with that organization.

[TigerJ]

Re: Power Rankings

To the national media Buffalo's offseason moves looks strange. Granted, a few of them could be debated, but not trading McGahee. He was a malcontent who didn't give full effort. You can't have those on your team, star or not. Fletcher was a liability in run defense and Clements was going to be too expensive any way you cut it. So what do you debate. That Dockery and Langston Walker were over paid? Maybe. That Buffalo could have retained Spikes. Probably. We know Spikes had requested a trade, but we don't know how he put that to the Bills. They might have felt he would be a problem in the locker room, and that combined with the uncertainty of recovery from his achilles surgery must have been enough in the Bills' eyes to question whether his salary was justified. Unless Buffalo's draft turns out to have been spectaular again, Buffalo may have moved mostly sideways this season, but I think they improved somewhat in terms of character and attitude, and that may set the stage for a major improvement in 2008, if the offseason losses aren't too great next season.