If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
I've watched it a dozen times now and it clearly wasn't a goal. It looks to me like the puck hits the front of the crossbar and caroms out the other side, almost at the perfect expected angle. The puck is clearly in front of the crossbar at all times.
How do we know it wasn't reviewed? The play didn't stop after this play. It goes on for a while. They were probably looking at it while play continue'd. It was the only game that night. What else did they have to do?
It wasn't a goal. After reading Skatezilla's post I went back on the DVR and looked at it again. It clearly hits the crossbar and you can't see it as it goes across the remainder of the crossbar and you finally see it when it comes out to the left.
Here is what it did:
Because of the angle you couldn't see it across the front of the crossbar unless you are in slow motion.
I forget that refs name, but he was right there, in position to see the angle and the way the puck hit the crossbar and bounced out. There was no need for a replay, he was right there.
In the interest of fairness here is some compelling evidence that maybe it isn't a goal.
This Idiot needs to realize that hitting the back pipe does cause a ding, and stop calling me an Idiot, since Im the one that Made the video I Assuming he's talking to me.
Hockey night in Canada showed the replay from behind the net. It hit emerys glove, then hit the crossbar on its flatside causing the weird bounce off the pipe.
Also--- Brad Riter just confirmed it on "The Power-Play", he seen the same video as I did. He puts a positive spin on EVERYTHING relating to the Sabres.. and for him to say "I'm 100% sure it was not a goal" says something.
NO GOAL.
“You hold a players only meeting and get each guy to stand up and say what he can bring to the table... and if he doesn't, you punch him in the face.” ~~ Harry Neale, on how to fix the Sabres season.
Hockey night in Canada showed the replay from behind the net. It hit emerys glove, then hit the crossbar on its flatside causing the weird bounce off the pipe.
Also--- Brad Riter just confirmed it on "The Power-Play", he seen the same video as I did. He puts a positive spin on EVERYTHING relating to the Sabres.. and for him to say "I'm 100% sure it was not a goal" says something.
Comment