Fullback?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • feldspar
    Registered User
    • Mar 2007
    • 13620

    Fullback?

    Do we even have a fullback? We have three tight ends currently penciled in as being our fullback. Number one on the depth chart is Ryan Neufeld, followed by Brad Cieslak and Derek Schouman, the 7th round pick that can play TE or FB.

    We are in trouble in this position if we are going into the season with Ryan Neufeld as the starting FB.

    Are we looking at Wright to be a fullback? We have 3 workable RBs. Maybe we'll put 2 of them in a lot. I don't know.
  • mikemac2001
    is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
    • Mar 2003
    • 4574

    #2
    Re: Fullback?

    Originally posted by feldspar
    Do we even have a fullback? We have three tight ends currently penciled in as being our fullback. Number one on the depth chart is Ryan Neufeld, followed by Brad Cieslak and Derek Schouman, the 7th round pick that can play TE or FB.

    We are in trouble in this position if we are going into the season with Ryan Neufeld as the starting FB.

    have you read anything, they dont want a true FB

    this offense dont need one

    MUCK
    FIAMI

    Comment

    • feldspar
      Registered User
      • Mar 2007
      • 13620

      #3
      Re: Fullback?

      Originally posted by mikemac2001
      have you read anything, they dont want a true FB

      this offense dont need one
      Explain.

      Comment

      • THATHURMANATOR
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 69112

        #4
        Re: Fullback?

        Who was the fullback on the great Rams offenses in past years....

        EXACTLY!!!!

        Comment

        • mikemac2001
          is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
          • Mar 2003
          • 4574

          #5
          Re: Fullback?

          Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
          Who was the fullback on the great Rams offenses in past years....

          EXACTLY!!!!

          theres my explanation

          MUCK
          FIAMI

          Comment

          • patmoran2006
            Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
            • Dec 2005
            • 19840

            #6
            Re: Fullback?

            Originally posted by mikemac2001
            have you read anything, they dont want a true FB

            this offense dont need one
            edited for TOS violation
            Last edited by shelby; 05-24-2007, 06:26 PM.


            Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

            Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

            Comment

            • feldspar
              Registered User
              • Mar 2007
              • 13620

              #7
              Re: Fullback?

              Originally posted by mikemac2001
              theres my explanation
              Now I enlightened. We don't want a fullback because we don't need one, and we don't need one "just 'cuz."

              Comment

              • mikemac2001
                is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
                • Mar 2003
                • 4574

                #8
                Re: Fullback?

                i answered it, i said many post and articles have talked about how we dont use a true FB more of a TE/FB

                edited...
                Last edited by shelby; 05-24-2007, 06:29 PM.

                MUCK
                FIAMI

                Comment

                • patmoran2006
                  Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 19840

                  #9
                  Re: Fullback?

                  and....edited.
                  Y'all are making me work too hard.
                  Last edited by shelby; 05-24-2007, 06:29 PM.


                  Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                  Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                  Comment

                  • patmoran2006
                    Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 19840

                    #10
                    Re: Fullback?

                    Originally posted by mikemac2001
                    And i answered it, i said many post and articles have talked about how we dont use a true FB more of a TE/FB
                    This is how you call answering a honest question?
                    Last edited by shelby; 05-24-2007, 06:31 PM.


                    Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                    Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                    Comment

                    • mikemac2001
                      is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 4574

                      #11
                      Re: Fullback?

                      THIS OFFENSE DOESNT NEED TRUE FB its been SAID Hundred of times, i answered it but i mean its something that has been known maybe he didnt know but im sure he knows rams didnt use one and thats what this O is based on

                      but you have your feelings you can express them just dont need to use hurtful names
                      Last edited by shelby; 05-24-2007, 06:30 PM.

                      MUCK
                      FIAMI

                      Comment

                      • feldspar
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 13620

                        #12
                        Re: Fullback?

                        Originally posted by mikemac2001
                        have you read anything, they dont want a true FB

                        this offense dont need one
                        "Have you read anything" is just like saying "hey, stupid." My feelings aren't hurt at all, but this isn't really necessary.

                        "We don't need one." This is what you said. It's not insightful at all, for one thing. You could explain why we don't need a fullback, how we plan to compensate for not having one, or why our scheme is better without a fullback...

                        I'm kind of convinced that you don't know how to answer any of these questions. "We don't need one" shows no knowledge of the subject.

                        Comment

                        • mikemac2001
                          is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 4574

                          #13
                          Re: Fullback?

                          Originally posted by feldspar
                          "Have you read anything" is just like saying "hey, stupid." My feelings aren't hurt at all, but this isn't really necessary.

                          "We don't need one." This is what you said. It's not insightful at all, for one thing. You could explain why we don't need a fullback, how we plan to compensate for not having one, or why our scheme is better without a fullback...

                          I'm kind of convinced that you don't know how to answer any of these questions. "We don't need one" shows no knowledge of the subject.
                          To be honest i thought i posted something else and it was what i was thinking so i do apologize for that...i thought i posted about how they want a FB/TE

                          so sorry about that...but patm idc what he says

                          MUCK
                          FIAMI

                          Comment

                          • feldspar
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 13620

                            #14
                            Re: Fullback?

                            Originally posted by mikemac2001
                            To be honest i thought i posted something else and it was what i was thinking so i do apologize for that...i thought i posted about how they want a FB/TE

                            so sorry about that...but patm idc what he says
                            Fair enough, but I find it hard to believe that the Bills are NEVER going to use a fullback on ANY of their plays for blocking, power running, etc.

                            Someone is going to line up as fullback on some plays. I just find it strange if Neufeld is the first choice.

                            Comment

                            • jamesiscool
                              suck it fool.
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 733

                              #15
                              Re: Fullback?

                              this schoumann kid sounds like he may be the nect fullback. when shelton went down with an injury last season cieslak lined up at FB. i dont see neufeld becoming the new "FB" of the team. he's an adequate blocker at best and isn't a threat coming out of the backfield to catch passes.
                              Sec 241 row 12 seat 23

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X