If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Obviously Bruce is No. 1. Phil Hansen is second at 61.5. Right behind him, Aaron Schobel with 60.5. Thus, Schobel needs just 1.5 more sacks to jump into second.
that is one of the most impressive records in NFL history....the closest anyone will get to that in the NFL today is JUlius Peppers....how many sacks does he have so far?
that is one of the most impressive records in NFL history....the closest anyone will get to that in the NFL today is JUlius Peppers....how many sacks does he have so far?
If he's lucky he'll get 140. He's played five years and has recorded 53.5 sacks. Thats about ten- eleven a year. So he'll have another five years in his prime, where he'll rack up another 45-60 sacks. Than if he plays another four years over the hill, he'll probably record 30- 40 after he goes over the hill. Thats 150 max.
Comment