WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

[patmoran2006]

49ers | Rayburn agrees to terms
Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:33:20 -0700
Len Pasquarelli, of ESPN.com, reports the San Francisco 49ers have agreed to terms with unrestricted free-agent DT Sam Rayburn (Eagles) on a one-year deal worth a base salary of $595,000 with incentives and includes a modest signing bonus.


Only 595K?
Come on, we coulda given him Tim ANderson money (850k).. This guy is better than Anderson and when we end up giving Walker back, his role would've increased.

WTF..

[OpIv37]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

Don't you read the posts around here? McCargo is coming back (probably, well... maybe) so our DL will be fine.

[Mad Bomber]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

Don't you read the posts around here? McCargo is coming back (probably, well... maybe) so our DL will be fine.

...plus we traded for Darwin Walker.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

He said he wanted to go to the place he would get the most PT and money was not important since he is playing UFA next year.

[patmoran2006]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

LOL

[patmoran2006]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

He said he wanted to go to the place he would get the most PT and money was not important since he is playing UFA next year.

I cant get over that avatar.
whats the matter with you man..?

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

It is visual proof I am better looking than Hillary!

[OpIv37]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

I am better looking than Hillary!

so is most of the stuff that comes out of a doberman's ass.

[Mad Bomber]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

It is visual proof I am better looking than Hillary!

You are. And such a stylish dresser...

[streetkings01]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

49ers | Rayburn agrees to terms
Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:33:20 -0700
Len Pasquarelli, of ESPN.com, reports the San Francisco 49ers have agreed to terms with unrestricted free-agent DT Sam Rayburn (Eagles) on a one-year deal worth a base salary of $595,000 with incentives and includes a modest signing bonus.


Only 595K?
Come on, we coulda given him Tim ANderson money (850k).. This guy is better than Anderson and when we end up giving Walker back, his role would've increased.

WTF..

Do you cry about everyting? Maybe the FO didnt see him as being an upgrade over Anderson.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

You are. And such a stylish dresser...

What can I say?

Women always flock to me.

Wooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!

"Ladies, one of you may be next, but none of you may be first!"

[patmoran2006]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

Do you cry about everyting? Maybe the FO didnt see him as being an upgrade over Anderson.

You are an upgrade over Tim Anderson

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

You are an upgrade over Tim Anderson

Either of my cats would be an upgrade over Anderson.

[Jan Reimers]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

In all seriousness, Rayburn may NOT be an upgrade over Anderson. This may be a case of "the grass always LOOKS greener. . ."

Also, Marv will have Walker signed any day now, if for no other reason than to stop the *****ing on this board.

[bigbub2352]

Re: WHy Didnt we Sign Rayburn?

Because Rayburn was Tim Anderson's brother it was a conspiracy Timmy was trying to get someone in here just like him, so they used a fake name