I am very optimistic about the Bills offense this year. I think it will be very exciting to watch and along with special teams should keep us in many games this year.
However, I cannot keep watching posts where the "D should be better."
I was optimistic about the Bills D earlier this year but:
1) Without a healthy McCargo and Darwin Walker we will be worse in the middle where we were totally exploited last year.
2) Sorry but Crowell-Ellison/DiGorgio-Poz is not Crowell-Fletcher-Spikes. Maybe it will be better but not right now.
3) Kelsay, Schobel, and Denney I don't see do anything more than they have already done. Maybe Hargrove takes it up a notch and adds a little more to the pass rush.
4) I think Nate was overrated. However, this is IMO and doesn't mean that the odds are that we will struggle back there, especially without pressure up front.
We need to save the improvement argument. Same ingredients, bake at 350, doesn't get you an entirely different cake.
However, I cannot keep watching posts where the "D should be better."
I was optimistic about the Bills D earlier this year but:
1) Without a healthy McCargo and Darwin Walker we will be worse in the middle where we were totally exploited last year.
2) Sorry but Crowell-Ellison/DiGorgio-Poz is not Crowell-Fletcher-Spikes. Maybe it will be better but not right now.
3) Kelsay, Schobel, and Denney I don't see do anything more than they have already done. Maybe Hargrove takes it up a notch and adds a little more to the pass rush.
4) I think Nate was overrated. However, this is IMO and doesn't mean that the odds are that we will struggle back there, especially without pressure up front.
We need to save the improvement argument. Same ingredients, bake at 350, doesn't get you an entirely different cake.
Comment