Since we signed Bobby Shaw, is he who we wanted

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Akhippo
    Registered User
    • Nov 2002
    • 838

    Since we signed Bobby Shaw, is he who we wanted

    I personally wanted Dyson, but if Shaw wants to be a #3, all the more better.
    Buy land in AK now. In ten years due to global warming, it will be the new tropical paradise, minus the tropics
  • Romes
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 5766

    #2
    I still hope they bring in Jenkins to return kicks.
    Originally posted by paladin warrior
    RALPH is drove me nut.

    Comment

    • RedEyE
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 24661

      #3
      The 'Skins may have taken Dyson out of the picture, but lets not count him out yet. I'm willing to bet if Buffalo does shell out more cash for another WR it's going to be Jenkins. Mikey said that GW was really impressed with his size - blocking skills downfield. Shaw will be used mainly for special teams, punt returner.

      Comment

      • venis2k1
        Youboty can hope
        • Jul 2002
        • 4621

        #4
        Shaw was a great pickup!!!! I wonder what he signed for???

        Comment

        • Romes
          Registered User
          • Jul 2002
          • 5766

          #5
          Yeah, what RedEye said.

          Shaw actually does have pretty good punt return statistics.
          Originally posted by paladin warrior
          RALPH is drove me nut.

          Comment

          • don137
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 7720

            #6
            I am guessing Shaw is more of a 5th receiver replacing Rogers...

            Comment

            • Romes
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 5766

              #7
              I see him as atleast a 3rd or 4th. He is atleast better than Charles Johnson.
              Originally posted by paladin warrior
              RALPH is drove me nut.

              Comment

              • Tatonka
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 21289

                #8
                he put up reed numbers last year as a 3rd wr.. that was with brunell throwing.. he should be a fine 3rd wr here..

                if we sign dyson or jenkins, fine.. if not.. oh well.
                "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe

                Comment

                • Akhippo
                  Registered User
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 838

                  #9
                  So does this move CJ down to the 5th WR and STer, Shaw to 4th and return man, so that means we could still get Dyson as the 3rd WR. Sounds good to me. That means no Jenkins though.
                  Buy land in AK now. In ten years due to global warming, it will be the new tropical paradise, minus the tropics

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X