Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mitchy moo
    Roways rooking ahread!
    • Sep 2005
    • 18380

    Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

    Find 2 guys that just left and how they did on plus minus:

    Captain clutch Drury that we couldn't do without: + 1 all year long

    Briere: + 17 but he was 10th on our list.

    Vanek: + 47 (lead the NHL)

    Who do you sign, the guy that helps you all game long not get behind?? Vanek and Roy rule a very telling stat, plan on both getting much better.








    Stats Filter:
    Team Stats
    OffensePOSGPGAPts+/-PIMPPGPPASHGSHAGWGTSOGPct
    Thomas VanekLW8243418447401570050237.181
    Derek RoyC752142633760681130130.162
    Brian CampbellD8264248283518011092.065
    Jason PominvilleRW8234346825302112250212.160
    Jaroslav SpacekD6551621206218002078.064
    Henrik TallinderD4741014193400000034.118
    Dmitri KalininD8272229193603100086.081
    Maxim AfinogenovRW5623386119667130030151.152
    Jochen HechtC761937561939360110197.096
    Daniel BriereC8132639517899210060234.137
    Teppo NumminenD79227291732012010069.029
    Paul GaustadC5491322117435010075.120
    Toni LydmanD6721719105502011044.045
    Nathan PaetschD6322224105009000062.032
    Daniel PailleLW29381151800010045.067
    Drew StaffordRW4113142753331003067.194
    Clarke MacArthurLW193474400000016.188
    Patrick KaletaRW70223210000006.000
    Michael FunkD5022200000001.000
    Tim ConnollyC2101120000002.500
    Chris DruryC7737326913017103090199.186
    Andrej SekeraD2000120000000.000
    Last edited by Mitchy moo; 07-09-2007, 02:26 PM.
  • TheGhostofJimKelly
    Registered User
    • May 2003
    • 12459

    #2
    Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big of

    I can understand where you are coming from and I can appreciate the effort, however, Drury always played against the top lines in the league. Not only offensive, but defensive. Vanek usually rolled against the third lines of teams. Either way, a +43 is still pretty impressive.

    Comment

    • don137
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 7720

      #3
      Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

      One thing that will really hurt about losing Briere is he was probably one of our best if not the best in overtime shootouts. The Sabres won a lot of shootouts because of Briere and Miller. Vanek really needs to improve in shoots next year and replace Briere.

      Comment

      • patmoran2006
        Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
        • Dec 2005
        • 19840

        #4
        Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

        Unbelievable..


        Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

        Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

        Comment

        • Meathead
          Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
          • Jul 2002
          • 21349

          #5
          Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

          who cares about shootouts

          unless it comes down to a playoff spot i could give a damn about where they finish in the standing

          1 - 8 doesnt make a damn bit o diff

          by the time a series gets to game seven anybody can win it

          busting your ass to try to be the top of the conf or division in the nhl is the least important in all of the major sports
          One set of rules for all in the beloved community

          Comment

          • Meathead
            Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
            • Jul 2002
            • 21349

            #6
            Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

            +/- is at least as much arbitrary as it is a reflection of skill

            cmon vanek is good but he isnt the dynamite defensive forward of the decade. he played against second and third tier players all the time

            his +/- for the upcoming season is going to be close to even. trust me
            One set of rules for all in the beloved community

            Comment

            • don137
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 7720

              #7
              Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

              Originally posted by Meathead
              who cares about shootouts

              unless it comes down to a playoff spot i could give a damn about where they finish in the standing

              1 - 8 doesnt make a damn bit o diff

              by the time a series gets to game seven anybody can win it

              busting your ass to try to be the top of the conf or division in the nhl is the least important in all of the major sports

              Don't care about shootouts? That makes absolutely no sense. Last I checked winners of shootouts get 2 points and the loser gets 1 point. Winning/losing the majority of the shootouts could be the difference in making the playoffs and sitting home for the playoffs. Go ask anyone that plays in the NHL and see if they don't care about shootouts.
              I agree you need to bust your butt in the playoffs to succeed but first you need to get there plus home ice is nice too.

              Comment

              • Night Train
                Retired - On Several Levels
                • Jul 2005
                • 33117

                #8
                Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

                Vanek wasn't out there killing penalties and playing against the opposing teams top line every night.

                I like Vanek but lets not wave a broad brush, based on a plus/minus number. Drury should still be here.
                Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                Comment

                • Meathead
                  Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 21349

                  #9
                  Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

                  Originally posted by Meathead
                  unless it comes down to a playoff spot
                  One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                  Comment

                  • Mitchy moo
                    Roways rooking ahread!
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 18380

                    #10
                    Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

                    Did we get to the shootout because of Vanek going +47 or Drury going +1. Vanek didn't cause as many goals against and scored 43 for himself. The idea behind + / - is to score more on the ice than scored on you, which obviously happened.

                    You can also argue about the 2 & 3rd line but most teams we played had an excellent 2nd line and was no cake walk. Who has more of an upside a 43 goal scorer with a +47 rating or Drury? Drury was overated and is now way overpaid.

                    Comment

                    • TheGhostofJimKelly
                      Registered User
                      • May 2003
                      • 12459

                      #11
                      Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big of

                      Originally posted by Night Train
                      Vanek wasn't out there killing penalties and playing against the opposing teams top line every night.

                      I like Vanek but lets not wave a broad brush, based on a plus/minus number. Drury should still be here.
                      Shorthanded goals don't count against your +/-.

                      Comment

                      • RockStar36
                        Dude's Little Ignorant Crony
                        • Sep 2004
                        • 24761

                        #12
                        Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

                        Drury played with the young guys which hurt him. Plus he played a lot on the penalty kill.

                        Stats don't tell everything. Drury was a true leader and should have been the captain. Briere on the other hand, he can have fun in Philly.

                        D & S Sports



                        Comment

                        • Crisis
                          Registered User
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 12738

                          #13
                          Re: Vanek and Briere + / - is just horrible, it explains why they didn't get a big offer

                          +/- is the most overrated stat in hockey.
                          Originally posted by LOSman WINS
                          Vanek is Austrian not European
                          Originally posted by Prov401
                          Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
                          Originally posted by better days
                          I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X