Further Proof that ESPN sucks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pinkerton Security
    Pinkerton's son
    • Feb 2006
    • 6003

    Further Proof that ESPN sucks

    After scouring the depth charts and watching the offseason workouts, Scouts Inc. ranks the teams with the best RBs from 1-32.



    Has our running backs, on the whole, 31st.

    31. Buffalo Bills
    The Bills made one of the most curious moves of the offseason when they dealt RB Willis McGahee to the Baltimore Ravens. McGahee was expected to be a big part of the Bills' run game in 2007, but the Bills knew they would have a hard time keeping McGahee after 2007, so they traded him. While it might be a good move for the future of the organization, it obviously doesn't help their running back situation this season. J.P. Losman is starting to develop into a No. 1 quarterback and to continue on that path, he is going to need to be backed up with a solid run game. The Bills addressed that need by drafting RB Marshawn Lynch from Cal in the first round. With only veteran Anthony Thomas as quality depth, Lynch essentially will be handed the starting running back job. He will not have to be a superstar as a rookie, but he will need to do enough to keep the defense honest and open up the passing game for Losman.



    To heck with the top 10, as they are probably better than ours. But here are the other teams ahead of us:

    11. Atlanta Falcons
    Despite leading the NFL in rushing the past two seasons, Atlanta does not have the top running back unit in the NFL. The reason it led the league in rushing is quarterback Michael Vick's 1,039 yards rushing. Even though he is a better runner than passer, he does not officially get listed in the running back unit. Despite that, this is still a very talented unit led by the underappreciated Warrick Dunn. Despite being 32 years old, Dunn has saved the best for last, having his three best statistical seasons in the last three years. His receiving numbers are down over those three seasons, but he hasn't been asked to catch the ball very much in this offense. Backup Jerious Norwood totaled 633 yards on 99 carries last season for a whopping 6.4 yards per carry average as a rookie. Norwood's role will expand this season, which gives the Falcons a very explosive 1-2 punch. 12. Cincinnati Bengals
    Despite finishing the 2006 season with the 26th-ranked rushing offense in the NFL, the Bengals have a lot of talent in their backfield. Part of the Bengals' inability to run the ball stems from not staying committed to run and becoming pass happy. Starting RB Rudi Johnson just didn't get enough touches last season. He is a solid No. 1 running back, but he is also a back who gets better with touches because he can wear down a defense. Backup Chris Perry has missed a lot of time with injuries but when healthy is an excellent threat catching the ball out of the backfield. Kenny Watson is also a player who can fill a third-down role, and the team spent its second-round pick this past draft of former Auburn RB Kenny Irons. Throw in FB Jeremi Johnson, who is an excellent player, and all of a sudden this is a team with a lot of talent in the backfield. The key in 2007 will be staying more committed to the run.
    13. Oakland Raiders
    Despite finishing the 2006 regular season ranked 29th in rushing yards per game, it would be hard to argue against the talent the Raiders will line up with in 2007. LaMont Jordan should be the starter, and though he missed some time with injuries last season, he is an extremely talented runner. With the addition of a new coaching staff, the team wanted to add some depth so it added former Colts starter Dominic Rhodes. Rhodes will miss the first four games of the season because of a violation of the substance abuse policy, but will contribute if he can stay out of trouble and return to the team in good physical condition. Rhodes' status moved the Raiders out of the top 10. Throw in speed back Justin Fargas, who was productive at times last season, and the drafting of rookie Michael Bush at the top of the fourth round and this unit is extremely deep. The inability of the Raiders to run the ball last season had to do with poor offensive line play and being behind early and often. Those facts do not diminish the overall talent this unit has going into 2007.
    14. St. Louis Rams
    Starting Rams RB Steven Jackson is a workhorse and one of the best young players in the NFL. Jackson had 1,528 yards rushing last season on 346 carries. He was also second on the team in receptions with 90. Although Jackson is one of the best young players in the NFL, the depth behind him is not great. He will be backed up initially by veteran Travis Minor but look for rookie second-round pick Brian Leonard to get some reps as a change of pace runner.
    15. Baltimore Ravens
    For the first time in a long time, the Ravens will have a new look at running back when they open the 2007 season. Gone is former starting RB Jamal Lewis (Cleveland) and in is RB Willis McGahee (acquired from Buffalo). Lewis had a great Ravens career, but he has lost a step and did not give them the big-play potential that McGahee will provide. McGahee is a tough runner with very good vision who should flourish in the Ravens' cutback run attack. The Ravens also have very good depth with Mike Anderson, who has been a starter in this league, and Musa Smith, who has talent but hasn't been able to stay healthy. The Ravens will once again be a team that relies on the run to set up the pass.
    16. Pittsburgh Steelers
    Some might think this is a little low ranking for the Steelers, but we have questions about their running game. This unit is not very deep and there are no real proven commodities behind starter Willie Parker. Parker had an excellent 2006 season and showed he could carry the load as the starter. The backups are Najeh Davenport and Kevan Barlow, but neither guy has played to his full NFL potential. The offensive line is also in a bit of flux with the retirement of center Jeff Hartings, which could hinder the overall effectiveness of the run game.

    17. New York Jets
    Despite not having a dependable No. 1 back in the fold, the Jets finished the 2006 regular season with the 20th-ranked rushing offense in the NFL. With a young, blossoming offensive line and the addition of a proven starting running back in Thomas Jones, we look for their run game to be better in 2007. Jones is a proven commodity who showed in Chicago that he can start and be an effective player when given touches. His leadership will only enhance the play of second-year back Leon Washington and Chris Houston. This was a unit that was more running back by committee in the past. Jones will carry the bulk of the load, but the quick and versatile Washington will provide a nice change of pace.
    18. Miami Dolphins
    Miami finished the 2006 season with the 22nd-ranked run offense in the NFL, but that number is bound to improve under new head coach Cam Cameron, who will be more committed to running the football. The Dolphins have a very good stable of runners to work with, starting with Ronnie Brown, whom Cameron will look to build his offense around. Brown is coming off his first 1,000-yard season and will continue to improve. Cameron also wants to add a little more speed at the position and that is why the Dolphins added former Florida State RB Lorenzo Booker with their third-round pick. Booker is a quick runner with solid hands and should contribute early on as a change-of-pace back to the more powerful Brown.
    19. Philadelphia Eagles
    Under head coach Andy Reid, the Eagles have always had talent in the backfield. When starting QB Donovan McNabb was injured last season, they did a much better job of using that talent. Starting RB Brian Westbrook has shown that he is physical enough to carry the load as their No. 1 option. Westbrook puts a tremendous amount of pressure on opposing defenses because of his versatility. Backup Correll Buckhalter has overcome injuries to be a decent backup. No. 3 RB Ryan Moats is a poor man's Westbrook and is more of a scatback type. This team still lacks that big punisher to run between the tackles, but the Eagles have three running backs who fit the West Coast offense, which is what Reid likes in the position.

    20. Detroit Lions
    The Lions finished the 2006 regular season with the worst rushing offense in the NFL. While some of that has to fall on the running back unit, it's also a product of the offensive line and playing from behind every week. In terms of talent, the Lions have some players to work with. Starting RB Kevin Jones is coming off a foot injury, but has made great strides in rehab and should be ready to go in training camp. Jones rushed for only 689 yards last season but made some contributions in the passing game. The team added some big-play ability by trading for Tatum Bell. Bell is a straight-line speed guy who has been injury prone, but he is a threat to score any time he touches the football. The team also added T.J. Duckett and should get more contributions this year from 2006 third-round pick Brian Calhoun. The Lions have a good stable of RBs. Now, they need to be more committed to running the football.
    21. Carolina Panthers
    The best word to describe the Panthers' run game in 2006 would be underachieving. Despite having 205 and 227 carries over the past two seasons, starter DeShaun Foster has failed to eclipse 900 rushing yards in a season. The team stuck with Foster as the starter last season despite backup DeAngelo Williams' showing a little more explosiveness and big play ability. It will be an open competition for the starting spot this season, so don't be surprised if Williams wins the No. 1 job. Regardless of who the starter is, both backs need to be productive and control the ball on the ground to compensate for aging QB Jake Delhomme, who struggled last season. Carolina must be effective running if it is going open up the field for star WR Steve Smith.
    22. New England Patriots
    With a lackluster wide receiving unit last season, the Patriots focused more attention on their ground game and finished the 2006 season No. 12 in rushing offense. Missing from the unit this season will be running back Corey Dillon, who was released. That means second-year back Laurence Maroney is going to have to do the majority of heavy lifting this season. Maroney is talented, but it remains to be seen if he is durable enough to carry the load as a No. 1 running back. He's also coming off offseason shoulder surgery. The team does have good depth with Sammy Morris and Kevin Faulk, who is an experienced thrid-down back. Heath Evans can contribute as a running back or fullback. Not a lot of star power here, but the overall depth is solid.
    23. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
    After an excellent rookie season that saw him rush for 1,178 yards in 2005, Cadillac Williams had a difficult season. Williams never got on track last season, rushing for only 798 yards, and there was some speculation that he never played at 100 percent. He ended the season on the sidelines, missing the last two games with a foot injury. Williams will have to step up and play much better in 2007 if the Bucs are going to turn their fortunes around. The overall depth is solid with veteran Michael Pittman and FB/RB Mike Alstott, who is still solid in short-yardage situations. While the overall running back unit is pretty good, it could benefit from better play up front from the offensive line.
    24. Chicago Bears
    Chicago finished the 2006 season ranked 15th in rush yards per game, but that could drop in 2007. The team traded veteran Thomas Jones to the Jets. Jones was not only a solid player, but an excellent team leader. The No. 1 running back job now belongs to Cedric Benson. Benson never has been the full-time guy and will need to start earning the respect of his teammates this offseason. Jones was very well respected on this team and Benson's attitude has not always set well with his teammates. Benson has the talent to be an elite runner, but time will tell if he can become that. The depth is pretty good behind Benson. Backup Adrian Peterson is a versatile veteran who knows the offense. The team will also look to get rookie third-round pick Garrett Wolfe involved in the offense.
    25. Indianapolis Colts
    The Colts finished the 2006 regular season 18th in rushing yards per game. This might seem a little low for the defending Super Bowl champs, but they lost Dominic Rhodes and have marginal depth behind Joseph Addai. Addai is coming off a solid rookie campaign and likely will have to handle more than 90 percent of the load this season. The Colts see Addai in that Edgerrin James mold; he will rarely come out of a game. Addai is a good runner, and he catches the ball well out of the backfield. He is more than capable of carrying the load, but if he gets injured, the Colts' backfield would be a disaster with only DeDe Dorsey and Kenton Keith as backups.
    26. Arizona Cardinals
    Despite spending a ton of money to acquire Edgerrin James before the 2006 season, the Cardinals finished the regular season ranked 30th in the NFL in rushing offense. However, that had more to do with the offensive line than James. With a new coaching staff highlighted by offensive line coach Russ Grimm, the Cardinals are bound to run the ball better in 2007. Even with James, though, this unit is very average. J.J. Arrington doesn't run hard inside the tackles and consistently tries to bounce his runs to the edge. Marcel Shipp is a good No. 3, but has been reduced to primarily a short-yardage runner. The Cardinals can throw the ball but need more consistency from their rushing attack.
    27. New York Giants
    This might seem a little low to rank the Giants, but they come into this season with a lot of questions at RB. With longtime starter Tiki Barber retiring, the onus of the No. 1 RB position falls to former backup Brandon Jacobs. Jacobs possesses an excellent combination of size and speed and has been productive with his opportunities, but has never had to carry the entire load. The team added his backup when it traded for Reuben Droughns, who is coming off a poor season on and off the field in Cleveland. If Jacobs can be the change-of-pace runner he has shown flashes of, the Giants would move way up this list. Barber meant a lot to this team on the field as a runner and also as a receiver, so Jacobs has huge shoes to fill. Whether he can will go a long way in determining the Giants' fate.
    28. Houston Texans
    Ever since former No. 1 RB Domanick Williams, who changed his name from Domanick Davis, was hit with the injury bug, the Texans' rushing offense has been inconsistent at best. When Williams was healthy, he gave them a legitimate No. 1 threat. Williams missed all of last season, and they are still looking for someone to step up and fill his shoes. Last season the carries were divided among Ron Dayne, Wali Lundy and Samkon Gado. All three will be on the roster when the team goes to camp. But none of the three is a feature back, and that is where Ahman Green enters the picture. Green was added this offseason to carry the load. Green, who recently turned 30, is not the back he once was, but he is still an upgrade for the Texans.
    29. Tennessee Titans
    After finishing the 2006 season ranked fifth in rushing yards per game behind the legs of RB Travis Henry, the Titans come into the 2007 season with the biggest question mark in the NFL at running back. Henry was released this offseason, and the Titans haven't replaced his production. The expected 2007 starter, LenDale White, is believed to have reported to OTAs at close to 260 pounds. The team spent its 2007 second-round pick on Chris Henry from the University of Arizona. Henry is a junior who came out early after having marginal college production. His draft status skyrocketed after Henry had an excellent combine and individual workout. The wild card in this group is veteran RB Chris Brown, who re-signed with the team. Brown was on the outs with management last season, and the former 1,000-yard rusher was inactive for a number of games. Should Brown find his early career form, the Titans' rushing attack could be better then advertised. With QB Vince Young still feeling his way as a young starter, it is imperative the Titans back him up with a solid run game. As of right now, it is tough to see that coming to fruition.
    30. Cleveland Browns
    The Browns' rushing offense ranked 31st in the NFL in 2006. To correct that, the team added former Baltimore RB Jamal Lewis in the offseason. Lewis will be an upgrade over Reuben Droughns (traded to Giants), but how big an upgrade remains to be seen. Lewis rushed for 1,132 yards last season in Baltimore, but he averaged only 3.6 yard per carry, well below his career average. Lewis has averaged just 1,015 yards per season over the last three years. But he will be only 28 when the season starts, so the Browns are banking on his returning to form. The depth behind Lewis is extremely untested and Jason Wright or Jerome Harrison must step up to provide a third-down threat behind Lewis, who is not known for his receiving skills. The Browns are low in the rankings, but if Lewis can return to form, they have a chance to be a good run-oriented offense this season.


    How can Jamal Lewis alone better than us? There are so many things wrong with this list I dont know where to begin....

  • Earthquake Enyart
    Legendary Zoner
    • Jul 2002
    • 27521

    #2
    Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

    Who's 32nd?

    Comment

    • Scumbag College
      Registered User
      • Oct 2002
      • 4949

      #3
      Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

      ESPN is about the last place I go for sports news, I usually come to billszone.com and the Sabres site here as well.

      I still am trying to wrap my brain around why the Bills traded Mcgahee. I can only think of a couple minor reasons:

      1. He didn't want to be here.
      2. Last year of his contract.
      3. Underachiever.
      4. Questionable work ethic.
      5. Couldn't/Wouldn't learn the playbook.
      6. Had to leave the state to avoid child support bills.
      7. The Ravens gave up three draft picks, including two first day picks for this guy.

      So, yeah, what an idiotic move by Marv and Co.
      Remember Kevin Everett in your thoughts.

      Vote Nader in 2008!

      http://www.votenader.org/

      Comment

      • BADTHINGSMAN
        Registered User
        • Oct 2002
        • 10504

        #4
        Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

        Amazing how ESPN laughed when McGahee claimed to be the best RB in the NFL.. Now he is in a Ravens jersey, they treat him like he is.. Just wait till he cant block for his QB or gets his 3 yards per rush..

        Comment

        • gil
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 820

          #5
          Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

          I don't agree with it, but at the same time, we're going into the season with 2 rookies and Anthony Thomas - we're unproven, so I could see the merit there, but I think we're going to have one of the better rushing attacks in the AFC.

          Comment

          • ParanoidAndroid
            My battery is low and it's getting dark.
            • Apr 2004
            • 16833

            #6
            Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

            The funniest part was when they said Willis will flourish in the Ravens' cutback run attack? Cutback? When did Willis ever find a cutback lane? I watched him miss enough open lanes to know that he is not a cutback runner.
            I couldn't care less where some dude ranks us. Even if he ranked us 15th, I would say the same thing....Predictions and results are most often quite different.
            Results: McGahee sucked.....Lynch is an unknown.

            Comment

            • evol4276
              Registered User
              • Oct 2005
              • 1333

              #7
              Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

              so.. explain why the raiders are far ahead of us? because they have d. rhodes and jordan who hasnt done a thing since he came? they have a worse oline than us, too. im lost... w/e

              Comment

              • Mad Bomber
                Registered User
                • Jul 2002
                • 12927

                #8
                Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                Oh yeah. I'm gonna miss the 990 yards, 3.8 ypc that McGAYhee gave us last year. If he's a cutback runner, I'm Tiger Woods ( I have a 14 handicap).

                Comment

                • The Spaz
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 19066

                  #9
                  Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                  Haven't watched ESPN in almost 2 years except when I hear they have an interview with a Bills player.

                  Comment

                  • feldspar
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 13620

                    #10
                    Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

                    Originally posted by Earthquake Enyart
                    Who's 32nd?
                    Green Bay is 32nd.

                    Seriously, how much money does it cost to become an ESPN Insider? They've proven time and time again that there are no real insiders at ESPN. I would never pay to be and Insider because their evaluations are horse crap and show no real insight.

                    Sure, Marshawn Lynch is unproven in the NFL, but so is Adrain Peterson, and they've got the Vikings ranked 7th. At least they can be consistent. I don't know where to begin...These guys don't know what they are talking about; they'll be singing a different tune if they ever watch a Bills game this year.

                    Comment

                    • CJW
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 59

                      #11
                      Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                      They're rookies they haven't done a thing yet, what do you expect? They're only great in our minds, for now!

                      Comment

                      • Night Train
                        Retired - On Several Levels
                        • Jul 2005
                        • 33117

                        #12
                        Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                        I'm very excited about our RB situation.

                        Lynch and Wright add a lot of diverse ability that gives OC Steve Fairchild more options in his playcalling.

                        ESPN has no bearing with their "lists".
                        Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                        Comment

                        • DraftBoy
                          Administrator
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 107452

                          #13
                          Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                          I agree with the article for the most part, this is whole thread is just most fans convincing themselves that Anthony Thomas and our unproven rookies are better than they are. In reality we should be maybe 1 or 2 higher, but we are pretty close to the bottom of the league.
                          COMING SOON...
                          Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                          We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

                          Comment

                          • Mr. Miyagi
                            Lecter's Little Bitch

                            • Sep 2002
                            • 53616

                            #14
                            Re: Further Proof that ESPN sucks

                            Originally posted by The Spaz
                            Haven't watched ESPN in almost 2 years except when I hear they have an interview with a Bills player.
                            I only watch ESPN for Monday Night Football and maybe some ESPN Classic games.

                            Comment

                            • superbills
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 1170

                              #15
                              Re: Furhter Proof that ESPN sucks

                              Originally posted by feldspar
                              Green Bay is 32nd.

                              Seriously, how much money does it cost to become an ESPN Insider? They've proven time and time again that there are no real insiders at ESPN. I would never pay to be and Insider because their evaluations are horse crap and show no real insight.

                              Sure, Marshawn Lynch is unproven in the NFL, but so is Adrain Peterson, and they've got the Vikings ranked 7th. At least they can be consistent. I don't know where to begin...These guys don't know what they are talking about; they'll be singing a different tune if they ever watch a Bills game this year.
                              Originally posted by DraftBoy
                              I agree with the article for the most part, this is whole thread is just most fans convincing themselves that Anthony Thomas and our unproven rookies are better than they are. In reality we should be maybe 1 or 2 higher, but we are pretty close to the bottom of the league.
                              So, DraftBoy, reference the item quoted to feldspar. How is it that we're grasping for straws with our running game, yet it is justified for Minnesota to be ranked 7th with a RB core that's just as unknown? And what reason do we have to believe that our running attack will be worse than the Raiders, or the Bucs who's Cadillac is constantly in the shop for repairs? I think it's hard to argue that the Bills got a bum rap on this one.
                              "The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."
                              Ronald Reagan
                              40th president of US (1911 - 2004)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X