HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

    QB- LOSMAN, EDWARDS, NALL
    RB- LYNCH, JACKSON, DA TRAIN
    FB- NEUFELD
    WR- EVANS, PRICE, PARRISH, REED, AIKEN, WILSON
    TE- ROYAL, SHOUMAN, CUT EVERATT
    LT- PETERS, PENNINGTON
    LG- DOCKERY, BUTLER
    C- FOWLER, WHITTLE
    RG- WHITTLE, MERZ
    RT- WALKER, CHAMBERS
    LE- WALLACE, DENNEY
    DT- TRIPLETT, MCCARGO
    DT- WILLIAMS, POWELL
    RE- SHOEBEL, KELSAY, HARDGROVE
    LB- CROWELL, WIRE
    LB- POS, DIGIORNO
    LB- ELLISON, HAGGAN
    CB- MCGEE, GREER, WEBSTER, THOMAS, YOUBOTY
    S- WHITNER, WENDLING
    S- SIMPSON, WILSON

    KR- MCGEE( IF THEY DECIDE TO KEEP HIM THERE) JACKSON

    PR- PARRISH, JACKSON
  • GarnOFreak
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 411

    #2
    Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

    Originally posted by 83evans
    QB- LOSMAN, EDWARDS, NALL
    RB- LYNCH, JACKSON, DA TRAIN
    FB- NEUFELD
    WR- EVANS, PRICE, PARRISH, REED, AIKEN, WILSON
    TE- ROYAL, SHOUMAN, CUT EVERATT
    LT- PETERS, PENNINGTON
    LG- DOCKERY, BUTLER
    C- FOWLER, WHITTLE
    RG- WHITTLE, MERZ
    RT- WALKER, CHAMBERS
    LE- WALLACE, DENNEY
    DT- TRIPLETT, MCCARGO
    DT- WILLIAMS, POWELL
    RE- SHOEBEL, KELSAY, HARDGROVE
    LB- CROWELL, WIRE
    LB- POS, DIGIORNO
    LB- ELLISON, HAGGAN
    CB- MCGEE, GREER, WEBSTER, THOMAS, YOUBOTY
    S- WHITNER, WENDLING
    S- SIMPSON, WILSON

    KR- MCGEE( IF THEY DECIDE TO KEEP HIM THERE) JACKSON

    PR- PARRISH, JACKSON
    Okay, that's 49 players (you have Wilson listed twice).

    P- MOORMAN
    K- LINDELL

    We still get two more players for the 53 man team. Prolly an OL and a LB.
    "Littlest Bill provides biggest punch"
    Niagara Gazette reports: 'Parrish’s return was more about an electric returner scaring the bejeezus out of would-be tacklers than a group of kindergartners feebly chasing a hamster after someone forgot to latch the cage.'

    Comment

    • Yasgur's Farm
      Moderator
      • Feb 2005
      • 7091

      #3
      Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

      Where's Wright?
      Kelsay not starting at LE?
      Who's Hardgrove?
      Preston makes the team over Chambers.

      Comment

      • GreedoII
        Registered User
        • Aug 2007
        • 1301

        #4
        Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

        83evans!! this is the worst and stupidest post I have seen yet. LMAO

        You leave out Wright/not even 53 players/listing same guys...dude...go pick up a Streets and Smiths mag then post your crap...

        lol

        Comment

        • raphael120
          Jason Peters rigorous at home training regiment
          • Oct 2005
          • 5152

          #5
          Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

          I like Wilson at QB, CB, and KR too.

          Comment

          • Albany,n.y.
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 5599

            #6
            Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

            Originally posted by GarnOFreak
            Okay, that's 49 players (you have Wilson listed twice).

            P- MOORMAN
            K- LINDELL

            We still get two more players for the 53 man team. Prolly an OL and a LB.
            One of the Wilsons is Ralph, he's suiting up after last night's performance, kicking @ss & taking names.

            Comment

            • Bone
              Bone
              • Oct 2006
              • 1093

              #7
              Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

              Originally posted by GreedoII
              83evans!! this is the worst and stupidest post I have seen yet. LMAO

              You leave out Wright/not even 53 players/listing same guys...dude...go pick up a Streets and Smiths mag then post your crap...

              lol
              A S S H O L E ALERT!!!!!!
              BILLIEVE

              Comment

              • tat2dmike77
                Let the planet get warmer. We'll grow oranges in Alaska!
                • Dec 2005
                • 9285

                #8
                Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

                Originally posted by GreedoII
                go pick up a Streets and Smiths mag then post your crap...

                lol
                They still print that crap mag? I remember when the bills were whipping everyone and those morons would always say this is the year buffalo falls to last place.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

                  Dumb asses this is a depth chart. Not a 53 man roster. You guys are pretty dumb for not figuring this out.

                  Comment

                  • Dr. Lecter
                    Zero for Zero!
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 67946

                    #10
                    Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

                    Originally posted by 83evans
                    Dumb asses this is a depth chart. Not a 53 man roster. You guys are pretty dumb for not figuring this out.
                    Dude, calm down. No need to call people names. I assumed a depth chart would have all players too, so chill a little.
                    Originally posted by mysticsoto
                    Lecter is right in everything he said.

                    Comment

                    • Mad Bomber
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 12927

                      #11
                      Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

                      Originally posted by 83evans
                      Dumb asses this is a depth chart. Not a 53 man roster. You guys are pretty dumb for not figuring this out.
                      Wow. Chill man!

                      I think that Wright makes the team.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: HOW THE TEAM SHOULD LOOK

                        Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
                        Dude, calm down. No need to call people names. I assumed a depth chart would have all players too, so chill a little.

                        I wasnt going to put all of the players on it just the starters. I should of just put the starters so there wont be any confusement.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X